9/11 Conspiracy Thread

#226
#226
volfanngatorland said:
It's actual pretty easy to tell the building did not fall at free fall speed. Your many hours of research didn't show you that.

Anyone with a brain can tell by watching a 10 second video
Click to expand...

You are fool. No, one fell in 11. The other in less than 10...
 
#229
#229
And wtc 7 fell in 6....

47 stories high and no plane hitting it. Look at the videos. It means every bolt and truss had to collapse all at once.

Not possible or even close...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#231
#231
Pacer92 said:
You are fool. No, one fell in 11. The other in less than 10...
Click to expand...

Tell me then, fool, why debris hits the ground before the falling tower does.

That leaves 1 of 2 options:

1) The debris fell faster than free fall speed

2) The tower fell slower than free fall speed

Which seems more likely to you, oh physics expert?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#233
#233
Here's a little more reading for you on the free fall matter:

In every photo and every video, you can see columns far outpacing the collapse of the building. Not only are the columns falling faster than the building but they are also falling faster than the debris cloud which is ALSO falling faster than the building. This proves the buildings fell well below free fall speed. That is, unless the beams had a rocket pointed to the ground.

Just look at any video you like and watch the perimeter columns.

Deceptive videos stop the timer of the fall at 10:09 when only the perimeter column hits the ground and not the building itself. If you notice, the building just finishes disappearing behind the debris cloud which is still about 40 stories high.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#234
#234
Grand Vol said:
I love how your so called scientific polls don't point to valid links or go to general public surveys.

You really aren't helping your case here
Click to expand...

Lol. Because most people who can think for themselves can see what happened.

Don't need the govt to rubber stamp what is common sense..
 
#236
#236
volfanngatorland said:
Here's a little more reading for you on the free fall matter:

In every photo and every video, you can see columns far outpacing the collapse of the building. Not only are the columns falling faster than the building but they are also falling faster than the debris cloud which is ALSO falling faster than the building. This proves the buildings fell well below free fall speed. That is, unless the beams had a rocket pointed to the ground.

Just look at any video you like and watch the perimeter columns.

Deceptive videos stop the timer of the fall at 10:09 when only the perimeter column hits the ground and not the building itself. If you notice, the building just finishes disappearing behind the debris cloud which is still about 40 stories high.
Click to expand...

15 stories of mass can not compress 90 stories into to ground. Its SIMPLE physics.
 
#237
#237
Pacer92 said:
Lol. Because most people who can think for themselves can see what happened.

Don't need the govt to rubber stamp what is common sense..
Click to expand...

Did you even check the links at your link? Or are you just posting up something hoping we won't dig deeper than the surface?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#238
#238
I just watched a Youtube video of some chick giving birth. I also read a website with pictures of a uterus. I am now an expert on delivering babies. Who's ready to bring their wife/girlfriend over to my house for some discount medical work? I will also provide free gynecological exams due to extensive viewing of videos that feature the female anatomy.
 
#241
#241
The Ron Mexico said:
I just watched a Youtube video of some chick giving birth. I also read a website with pictures of a uterus. I am now an expert on delivering babies. Who's ready to bring their wife/girlfriend over to my house for some discount medical work? I will also provide free gynecological exams due to extensive viewing of videos that feature the female anatomy.
Click to expand...

Hope Solo says hi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#243
#243
bamawriter said:
Explain how the 90 stories were "pushing up".
Click to expand...


A. Unreasonable Speed of Collapse

Besides the theoretical arguments supporting the hypothesis that intentional demolition, not fire, brought the Towers down, the huge volume of video evidence shows conclusively an array of specific details of the Towers' collapse that are wholly consistent with the particulars of intentional demolition. The first detail is the speed with which the Towers fell. Despite the huge amount of mass and material sitting underneath them, the tops of both Towers, like with Building 7, collapsed to the ground at close to free-fall speed. To put it more bluntly, if a massive crane hoisted the top 15 floors of the North Tower to the same height at which it sat on the morning of 9/11, and then released the top to fall unimpeded to the ground with nothing but air to block its way, it would have taken approximately 10 seconds to hit down. This is virtually the same speed it took the actual top 15 floors of the North Tower to collapse. With the entire in-tact, undamaged, unaffected 90 floors worth of core building sitting underneath it, somehow providing NO further resistance to the falling building than air itself. (Remember that the impact zone of the aircraft and the subsequent fire was from floor 90 up. No other part of the building could have possibly sustained any serious damage since heat and fire go up. And the government's official theory is that the top 15 floors essentially destabilized and failed, and its then unsupported weight began to pile drive downwardly onto the rest of the 90 as yet undamaged stories.)

Somehow, in a gross violation of the laws of physics, the remaining 90 floors and core of the North Tower sitting under the damaged section of the building offered little more resistance to impede the speed of the Tower's collapse than air itself. This is another unequivocal impossibility. The only thing that can account for the speed of the Towers' collapse is controlled demolition - where cutter charges and explosives were placed throughout the core of the building, timed to explode and pop out sections of floors and beams to clear a path and create the vacuum that was necessary to account for the tumbling speed of the Twin Towers. Almost exactly like these firefighters in this video surmised on the morning of September 11 before the story got officially r
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#244
#244
Pacer92 said:
15 stories of mass can not compress 90 stories into to ground. Its SIMPLE physics.
Click to expand...

What does that have to do with your insistence the building fell at free fall speed?

Your expert knowledge of "physics" should have told you that the first time you watched the video.

Try to be less emotionally erratic and deal with one topic at a time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#248
#248
Pacer92 said:
A. Unreasonable Speed of Collapse

Besides the theoretical arguments supporting the hypothesis that intentional demolition, not fire, brought the Towers down, the huge volume of video evidence shows conclusively an array of specific details of the Towers' collapse that are wholly consistent with the particulars of intentional demolition. The first detail is the speed with which the Towers fell. Despite the huge amount of mass and material sitting underneath them, the tops of both Towers, like with Building 7, collapsed to the ground at close to free-fall speed. To put it more bluntly, if a massive crane hoisted the top 15 floors of the North Tower to the same height at which it sat on the morning of 9/11, and then released the top to fall unimpeded to the ground with nothing but air to block its way, it would have taken approximately 10 seconds to hit down. This is virtually the same speed it took the actual top 15 floors of the North Tower to collapse. With the entire in-tact, undamaged, unaffected 90 floors worth of core building sitting underneath it, somehow providing NO further resistance to the falling building than air itself. (Remember that the impact zone of the aircraft and the subsequent fire was from floor 90 up. No other part of the building could have possibly sustained any serious damage since heat and fire go up. And the government's official theory is that the top 15 floors essentially destabilized and failed, and its then unsupported weight began to pile drive downwardly onto the rest of the 90 as yet undamaged stories.)

Somehow, in a gross violation of the laws of physics, the remaining 90 floors and core of the North Tower sitting under the damaged section of the building offered little more resistance to impede the speed of the Tower's collapse than air itself. This is another unequivocal impossibility. The only thing that can account for the speed of the Towers' collapse is controlled demolition - where cutter charges and explosives were placed throughout the core of the building, timed to explode and pop out sections of floors and beams to clear a path and create the vacuum that was necessary to account for the tumbling speed of the Twin Towers. Almost exactly like these firefighters in this video surmised on the morning of September 11 before the story got officially r
Click to expand...
You kinda messed up the copy and paste from the crazy website, but we still get the point.
 
#249
#249
This really is almost silly. And to think I am giving up the opportunity to discuss the UF ladies gymnastics team with Lawrence Wright right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#250
#250
volfanngatorland said:
What does that have to do with your insistence the building fell at free fall speed?

Your expert knowledge of "physics" should have told you that the first time you watched the video.

Try to be less emotionally erratic and deal with one topic at a time.
Click to expand...

It's only bothering you obviously. Physics is physics. Impossible is impossible.

Red sea...
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top