9/11 Conspiracy Thread

#276
#276
Seriously though, click on some of those links he's provided and read some of the other stories.

Its like Christmas morning
 
#282
#282
volfanhill said:
Chomsky explains why the studies you cite are crap

Noam Chomsky Schools 9/11 Truther; Explains the Science of Making Credible Claims | Open Culture
Click to expand...

1614108745_sheeple_dont_know_answer_3_xlarge.jpeg
 
#284
#284
I'm going to launch Pacer92caused911.com. With his innate trust of all anonymous websites, he'll turn himself into authorities the next day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#290
#290
After reading through this thread I just realized the meds the doc has me on are better than I thought they are. These pills have to be making me hallucinate because I have been reading some crazy azz shat that no one in their right mind would be posting. I have to be seeing things that are not there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#292
#292
Grand Vol said:
I know. That 9/11 truther guy keeps resorting to petty sheep jokes.
Click to expand...

And nobody else has really made fun of pacer at all right? Contrary to popular belief on VN, pacer makes some good points. There are experts who agree and disagree with the official theory of 9/11. Just because you feel his opinion that its a conspiracy is wrong, doesnt make him wrong. There are scholarly articles out there that question the veracity and accuracy of things like the NIST report.

I have no clue if its a conspiracy or not. Could it have happened exactly as the official theory said? Absolutely. Could it be a conspiracy? Absolutely. We will never know. So all we have is those who accept the government report as truth, those who dont know either way and those who think there is a lot more to it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#294
#294
BigOrangeTrain said:
And nobody else has really made fun of pacer at all right? Contrary to popular belief on VN, pacer makes some good points. There are experts who agree and disagree with the official theory of 9/11. Just because you feel his opinion that its a conspiracy is wrong, doesnt make him wrong. There are scholarly articles out there that question the veracity and accuracy of things like the NIST report.

I have no clue if its a conspiracy or not. Could it have happened exactly as the official theory said? Absolutely. Could it be a conspiracy? Absolutely. We will never know. So all we have is those who accept the government report as truth, those who dont know either way and those who think there is a lot more to it.
Click to expand...

It certainly doesn't help the case to post things like a "poll" showing 1/2 of America agrees when that poll is on a book forum and a total of 41 people "voted".

And that's the larger problem - many of the conspiracy "facts" get debunked quite easily but the purveyors treat them as a lump sum of unexplained items.

It's also not "if the official story isn't 100% true then it must be a conspiracy". Sure we may not know the absolute truth of all the details but that doesn't in any way mean that the government was "in on it" as most of the conspiracy people want to suggest. There's a loooonnnnnggg way between some spin on the story and complicity in the event.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#295
#295
BigOrangeTrain said:
And nobody else has really made fun of pacer at all right? Contrary to popular belief on VN, pacer makes some good points. There are experts who agree and disagree with the official theory of 9/11. Just because you feel his opinion that its a conspiracy is wrong, doesnt make him wrong. There are scholarly articles out there that question the veracity and accuracy of things like the NIST report.

I have no clue if its a conspiracy or not. Could it have happened exactly as the official theory said? Absolutely. Could it be a conspiracy? Absolutely. We will never know. So all we have is those who accept the government report as truth, those who dont know either way and those who think there is a lot more to it.
Click to expand...

I think you missed the joke...
 
#296
#296
volinbham said:
It certainly doesn't help the case to post things like a "poll" showing 1/2 of America agrees when that poll is on a book forum and a total of 41 people "voted".

And that's the larger problem - many of the conspiracy "facts" get debunked quite easily but the purveyors treat them as a lump sum of unexplained items.

It's also not "if the official story isn't 100% true then it must be a conspiracy". Sure we may not know the absolute truth of all the details but that doesn't in any way mean that the government was "in on it" as most of the conspiracy people want to suggest. There's a loooonnnnnggg way between some spin on the story and complicity in the event.
Click to expand...

Or my favorite (by no means limited to this particular conspiracy) the good old argument where anything that cannot be clearly and empirically explained can only be the result of some devious treachery. To some there is literally no such thing as honest ambiguity.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top