A coach you hold in high esteem.

I just think it's silly that so many people say "Oh, it's so amazing what he's doing at Iowa!" when he may be their 3rd best coach since 1950.

He also roids the **** out of his players. something him and harbaugh have in common.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
Last edited:
He also roids the **** out of his players. something him and harbaugh have in common.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Harbaugh does that? Hadn't heard of that. Though that would, explain the good line play.
 
Last edited:
Harbaugh does that? Hadn't heard of that. Probably explains the good line play.

Marecic's before and after pictures rival cushing. the oline gained ridiculous muscle as well. of course harbaugh simply said he implimented "nfl training" whatever that means.,
 
Top 40 program at best. Guess what your definition of decent is.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Decent. Not great. Not good. Just decent. Over .500 all-time. More than ten conference titles, as well as a handful post-integration. Only one game under .500 in bowl history. All-time winning record over their primary rival. :whistling: I think most people would call that decent.
 
Stanford and Vanderbilt are in very similar positions. They are both top calibre academic institutions that are very selective and tough to get into. This creates challenges in recruiting for their coaching staffs in that their pool of athletes to draw from is much smaller. This has historically put them behind the pack as far as overall athleticism is concerned.

Harbaugh took that challenge and turned it into an advantage by implementing more complex offenses sets and plays that his players learned to execute very very effectively (having Andrew Luck doesn't hurt either). He also did an excellent job of recruiting and helping players understand where they needed to get academically to gain entrance into Stanford and articulating to them the education and opportunities that would be presented to them through a Stanford education.

Now, could he do the same thing at Vandy? It might be a bit more challenging, due to the depth of the SEC compared to the Pac10, but I think he could do it.

I think he was the most talented offensive coach in college football. Sorry to see him go to the Pros.
 
More of the comparisons? Please. The football tradition of vanderbilt makes stanford look like usc.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
Gary Blair--A&M women's bb coach
Billy Kennedy-- A&M men's bb coach
Mike Sherman--A&M football coach

And a write in vote for A&M Athletic Director Bill Byrne, who I've come to respect over the past few years.
 
Gary Blair--A&M women's bb coach
Billy Kennedy-- A&M men's bb coach
Mike Sherman--A&M football coach

And a write in vote for A&M Athletic Director Bill Byrne, who I've come to respect over the past few years.


Good thing your not a homer.
 
Max Raby, hands down! He was my p.e coach in high school, and loved a good fist fight. Eye got away with delivering 3 arse whippings under his watch, and got to see many more with my own Two eyes... MuRrr
 
I wouldn't be surprised if Muschamp got off to a better than expected start at Florida but then failed to live up to expectations after that.


More likely the other way around.

We have 13 open scholarships this year. That's remarkable.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
More likely the other way around.

That's what most would say. I think Muschamp is a clown, but you have talent and Charlie the Hutt will get good production out of Brantley (assuming he's the guy) this year. The East also sucks, so I think that will lead to high expectations after this year. Just my opinion.
 
Spurrier. Always get a kick out of the guy. Does not put on a polished front like every coach under 50. He could be an jackass, but I always got the Ric Flair heel vibe off of him.


Rich Brooks was ok with me for some reason.

Gary Patterson.

Fitzgerald at NW.
 

VN Store



Back
Top