lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 72,765
- Likes
- 42,933
Distract or change the subject much?
Exactly what did you just attempt?
The subject is union thuggery in the context of Obama's sensitivity to "incivility" in the public discourse. On this occasion, we KNOW that teachers behaved as thugs in their protests and treatment of public property. We can reasonably suspect that they or their supporters/associates issued a number of threats.
Are you a hypocrite like Obama or are you willing to say the union protesters were 100% wrong for the way they conducted themselves?
Teachers were involved in the thuggery regardless of whether they made any of the threats or not. However, it borders on delusional to think that none of those threats were made by someone from the people most intimately effected by the confrontation.Incorrect. The OP was link to article about the threatening email and trying to analogize that to TP or other conservative candidates who have made irresponsible comments in their campaigns. I pointed out the two are not comparable and you said that the threat did not come from an anonymous nutjob, but from a teacher.
Nope. The point was and still is the hypocrisy of the left.I called you out on that ridiculous statement and, as usual, you and your minions just fall back into rants and raves about other things.
You have no evidence a teacher sent it. You ought to be ashamed of yourself for first making that absurd comment and second for refusing to correct it when it has been pointed out that you got your facts wrong.
Again.
Will you or will you not acknowledge a) the thuggery shown by the union people involved in the Wi protest and b) the hypocrisy of left wingers for not condemning the "incivility"?
Proof that teachers were the ones threatening?
A good portion of the people that protested were college age people. I'd be willing to bet that it was one of them.
Proof that teachers were the ones threatening?
A good portion of the people that protested were college age people. I'd be willing to bet that it was one of them.
LG, was the extreme rhetoric of the protestors and their allies at fault for the vandalism and threats?
I am certain if the tables were turned and this was a conservative protest you would say yes... of course, widespread TP/conservative rallies have occurred with nothing like the problems stemming from this liberal protest.
More evasion. Why are you avoiding the issue?
You asked if the "extreme rhetoric" of the protestors was what caused vandalism. You asked that in an effort to deflect my point that what happened in Wisconsin in terms of rhetoric cannot actually be ascribed to any Dem politician and therefore is not comparable to what Sharon Angle said.
I don't think its me evading here, my friend.
I’m proud to be here with people who understand that it’s more than just sending an email to get you going. Every once and awhile you need to get out on the streets and get a little bloody when necessary,” Rep. Mike Capuano (D-Ma.) told a crowd in Boston on Tuesday rallying in solidarity for Wisconsin union members.
You asked if the "extreme rhetoric" of the protestors was what caused vandalism. You asked that in an effort to deflect my point that what happened in Wisconsin in terms of rhetoric cannot actually be ascribed to any Dem politician and therefore is not comparable to what Sharon Angle said.
I don't think its me evading here, my friend.
Yes. You really are evading. Sharon Angle lost. She is not part of this equation. She received blame from the left for the Az shooting though her comments nor those of conservative radio apparently had nothing to do with it. The accusation from the left was alluded to in many of the straight news stories about Az. The left absolutely did its best to tie two unrelated events together so they could assign blame to viewpoints that disagreed with them.
Just answer the question. Where are liberals now that their side did things MUCH worse than those they were so quick to condemn just a few months ago? Why the hypocrisy?
FWIW, I believe in free speech. I think they have a right to be as offensive as they want. I think they even have a right to use imagery to convey points that does not necessarily indicate that they would actually do harm to someone.
My point was and is that the left's silence on the behavior of their side in Wisconsin is a tremendous illustration of their inconsistency and hypocrisy. I guess you either condemn the actions or continue to identify yourself with the left wing hypocrites.
He should not have said that and was roundly criticized by all sides.
Looking for some criticism of Angle from the GOP for saying what she said about Second Amendment remedies.....
.... still looking ..... still ...... still ...... still .... .
... .................... .............
...