Just a reminder that recruiting is less than a perfect science. These guys were all pretty much overlooked coming out of High School.
LB Clay Matthews-USC, walk-on
DT B.J. Raji- Boston College, 2 star
QB Aaron Rodgers- California, 3-star-community college transfer
WR Jordy Nelson-Kansas State, 2 star-only Division 1 offer and as a safety
RB James Starks-Buffalo, 2 star
Boise State beat Oklahoma in 07
Utah beat Bama in 09
Boise State beat UGA 11
Louisville beat Florida in 13
It's getting less rare.
The point I am trying to make is that gap between major and mid major is narrowing as I believe coaching plays a greater role.
Yea look at USC they are full of 5 stars and 4 stars with a few high 3 stars and were pre season ranked number one and almost everyone thought they were a lock to win ncaa tital but the whole team was a bust fron coach down,Matt Barkley would have been a top 3 pick if he had came out last year now he will be lucky to get drafted in round one. but after they lost people started saying that were they was not at 85 players on roster that hurt them.but i would rather have 70 4 and 5 star players than have 70 3 and 2 star and 13 4 star and one or 2 5 star.with the right coach the most talented team normally wins.but their is the boise states of the world that win 10 games a year with 2 and 3 star players.even if they only play a few top 40 programs a year and yet they do win a few games against much more talented teams,but i think it is good coaching plus alot of teams underestimating them saying but it is just boise state .U can have a team full of 5 stars and still suck. If the coaching staff doesn't get them to buy in to the team concept and can actually help those 5 stars perform at a level above their opponent whomever it maybe be they aren't going to be any better than a bunch of 2 stars. GBO!!!