A Timeline of Treason: Obama, Clinton, & the Deep State

#402
#402
Mick said:
And they concluded that she had already turned them over to the FBI. Don't let that get in your way.
Click to expand...

It’s funny that their attempt to sweep it under the rug may have caused the eventual timing to cost Hillary the election
 
#403
#403
golfballs said:
It’s funny that their attempt to sweep it under the rug may have caused the eventual timing to cost Hillary the election
Click to expand...

They were following up on the new information and it didn't need to be made public.
 
#404
#404
Mick said:
They were following up on the new information and it didn't need to be made public.
Click to expand...

I think the masses of Americans can't see the forest for the trees.

This whole thing comes down to an Obama cover-up. Let's be crystal clear.

Obama had his email communications with Clinton sealed. He did this by invoking a dubious presidential-records privilege. The White House 'insisted'...LOL... that the matter had nothing to do with the contents of the emails, 'of course'; rather, it was intended to vindicate the principle of confidentiality in presidential communications with close advisers. With the media content to play along, this had a twofold benefit:

Obama was able (1) to sidestep disclosure without acknowledging that the emails contained classified information and

(2) to avoid using the term ‘executive privilege’ — with all its dark Watergate connotations — even though that was precisely what he was invoking.

They thought she would win, and now that she didn't...the **** is hitting the fan.

Ok...so, Here’s what we know:

(1) It appears that from the start, Comey had no intention of prosecuting Hillary Clinton.

(2) Comey’s hand-selected team looking into the Trump and Clinton allegations included numerous members who disliked Trump and had ties to the Democratic Party.

(3) If Clinton had been found guilty of mishandling classified information (or even simply charged), President Obama might have also faced intense scrutiny, and possibly an investigation of his own, because Obama also emailed Clinton on her private server.

(4) It appears President Obama deliberately tried to use executive privilege to conceal the fact that he had communicated with Clinton via her private email server, which could be a crime if classified information had been exchanged. If those emails didn’t contain important information, why did Obama’s team work so hard to keep them from the public?

(5) Comey recommended Clinton not be prosecuted for using an illegal email server.

I’m not a lawyer, but I think it would be exceptionally difficult to prove any president is guilty of obstructing justice after “interfering” with an FBI investigation. Presidents are in charge of managing the executive branch, and the Department of Justice and FBI both fall under that umbrella. However, if liberals continue to suggest Trump is guilty of such a crime for firing Comey while he was investigating alleged collusion, then they could end up putting President Obama — who we now know had plenty of good, selfish reasons for ending the Clinton email investigation — in an exceptionally difficult situation.

This, ladies and gentlemen, is your government. What a mess.


eae5a626-727e-4946-a557-7c0ea98218a3.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#408
#408
This women knows how the Deep State works.

'They' don't like her...Sharyl Atkkisson, who's exposed their collusion with smear campaigns and media leaks...as well as obstruction stonewall tactics. You'll know why if you read her NYT Best Seller(s) “The Smear: How Shady Political Operatives and Fake News Control What You See, What You Think, and How You Vote" & "Stonewalled: My Fight for Truth Against the Forces of Obstruction, Intimidation, and Harassment in Obama's Washington"

Check her latest tweet out...

Since no law enforcement body will properly investigate the govt intrusion of my computers, were are handling it in federal court. So far so good. The govt has had to acknowledge that they owned the rogue IP addresses forensically found in my computers. 1/2

2/2 The judge has ordered @TheJusticeDept to comply with our subpoenas to DOJ, DOJIG, FBI, CIA, NSA, DIA, etc. So that's something.


Updated Chart: People in the FBI, Trump, Clinton, Russia, IG Probe | Sharyl Attkisson
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#411
#411
[twitter]https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/959163597719986176?ref_src=twcamp%5Eshare%7Ctwsrc%5Em5%7Ctwgr%5Eemail%7Ctwcon%5E7046%7Ctwterm%5E1[/twitter]

Twitter
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#416
#416
[twitter]https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/959290476124782592?ref_src=twcamp%5Eshare%7Ctwsrc%5Em5%7Ctwgr%5Eemail%7Ctwcon%5E7046%7Ctwterm%5E1[/twitter]
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#420
#420
Vol0725 said:
Could u image if Trump and RNC did that? The left dem hypocrisy is amazing.
Click to expand...

Amazing isn't it? If Trump did use the Russian collusion angle, wouldn't that have started during the Primary season to ensure he got the nomination? It's kind of crazy to think all the sudden they would pick Trump as their chosen "agent" to get to the White House. And has the DNC ever even mentioned that aspect?

<crickets>

But all of the sudden, they got hold of him during the General election to make sure Hillary didn't win. According to them at least.

Most curious is the fact if he was their "candidate" they didn't interfere until after he secured the nomination he was not guaranteed of getting when he announced. Shouldn't that have started far in advance of the General election to make sure he got the nomination?

<crickets>
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top