Word? IgnorableI don't know if there's a word for a person who is not a fan of the team, but hangs out on that team's board, trying constantly to start fights, continually seeks to find ways to malign the board's team and to praise it's rivals, and obviously takes malicious pleasure in upsetting as many people as possible. Sometimes this is accomplished by glaring backhanded compliments, sometimes by pretended handwringing while expressing "concerns," sometimes by extremely exaggerated and irrational "frustrations," all consonant with continuous desire to make threads and the site itself less usable and unenjoyable by derailing discussions with hostile bickering ad nauseum. All that with frequent appeals to himself as being "objective" as cover, protestations which double as his occassion to mock and deride our fans and the site. With evident satisfaction in getting any response, as recently noted. Is there a word for this kind of behavior? I can't think of it.
damsun.I don't know if there's a word for a person who is not a fan of the team, but hangs out on that team's board, trying constantly to start fights, continually seeks to find ways to malign the board's team and to praise it's rivals, and obviously takes malicious pleasure in upsetting as many people as possible. Sometimes this is accomplished by glaring backhanded compliments, sometimes by pretended handwringing while expressing "concerns," sometimes by extremely exaggerated and irrational "frustrations," all consonant with continuous desire to make threads and the site itself less usable and unenjoyable by derailing discussions with hostile bickering ad nauseum. All that with frequent appeals to himself as being "objective" as cover, protestations which double as his occassion to mock and deride our fans and the site. Is there a word for this kind of behavior?
This post needs saved and used as a guide. So well said. Someone said ath depts actually have folks that play this role in order to spread dissent. Your description nails the tactics.I don't know if there's a word for a person who is not a fan of the team, but hangs out on that team's board, trying constantly to start fights, continually seeks to find ways to malign the board's team and to praise it's rivals, and obviously takes malicious pleasure in upsetting as many people as possible. Sometimes this is accomplished by glaring backhanded compliments, sometimes by pretended handwringing while expressing "concerns," sometimes by extremely exaggerated and irrational "frustrations," all consonant with continuous desire to make threads and the site itself less usable and unenjoyable by derailing discussions with hostile bickering ad nauseum. All that with frequent appeals to himself as being "objective" as cover, protestations which double as his occassion to mock and deride our fans and the site. Is there a word for this kind of behavior?
Yeah..... BruinI don't know if there's a word for a person who is not a fan of the team, but hangs out on that team's board, trying constantly to start fights, continually seeks to find ways to malign the board's team and to praise it's rivals, and obviously takes malicious pleasure in upsetting as many people as possible. Sometimes this is accomplished by glaring backhanded compliments, sometimes by pretended handwringing while expressing "concerns," sometimes by extremely exaggerated and irrational "frustrations," all consonant with continuous desire to make threads and the site itself less usable and unenjoyable by derailing discussions with hostile bickering ad nauseum. All that with frequent appeals to himself as being "objective" as cover, protestations which double as his occassion to mock and deride our fans and the site. Is there a word for this kind of behavior?
Not Ap, Bradley said that himselfI believe AP said Bradley is going after Hunter and Gibson to be part of the family. Osbourne gonna be a Vol when it’s all said and done.
View attachment 471656
It’s always been too 100 players regardless of whatever the blue chip ratio you’re referencing. You can be a 4 star and ranked out of the top 300.Not what it is when people do the “blue chip ratio” meaning teams with 50% of their rosters with at least 4 and 5 star players