EricFreakingBerry
Yes!
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2009
- Messages
- 4,313
- Likes
- 1,149
I didn't click the link for the details, but was the bonus for last season's preformance or this season? If it was a preformance bonus from last season, then I have no problem with his actions. If it was a roster bonus for this season, then he needs to be at camp if he took the money. It actually seems to me that they should be able to get the money back if he doesn't show, but that would depend on how the contract was written.
He's getting incredibly obnoxious, and there's no way the Redskins will ever learn from these mistakes with that front office.
You're wrong there my friend....this year is the first year that Washington has an official GM under Snyder...everyone thought they'd go out and spend to get all the big free agents...name one marquee player that the Redskins signed this off season (Parker and Johnson do not fall into that category)
Yes it's front loaded, they've already paid him $26 MIL......being a Redskins fan, I pray that we trade him....nothing but a waste
They told him in February that they would release him to another team if he did not want to play for them before they gave him the check on April 1st. Haynesworth did not find a team to play for and took the check on April 1st, and now he is sitting out and demanding a trade. They are pissed because he took the money and still isn't apart of the team.
I think the money was most definitely for this season or they would not be pissed about it, and I think they will get the money back.
Also, just because you did it twice tells me you might not know, but it is spelled performance. Just looking out for you.
What championships?
Washington was never willing to release him. They had put him on the trading block for feelers but then changed their mind as a few teams started showing interest.
This doesn't change if he should have received the bonus or not though.