Alex Jones found liable over Sandy Hook hoax conspiracy

#102
#102
NorthDallas40 said:
Another parsing victory 10 posts in to where nobody cares anymore. You’re a legend in your own mind as usual. 🤡
Click to expand...

I can’t see how beating up on people who don’t know that flag burning is protected speech would make me a “legend.”

Doing it to someone who would rather dig themselves into a hole rather than just use Google and admit they were wrong is certainly enjoyable. Especially when they get all sulky like this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
#103
#103
RockyTop85 said:
I can’t see how beating up on people who don’t know that flag burning is protected speech would make me a “legend.”

Doing it to someone who would rather dig themselves into a hole rather than just use Google and admit they were wrong is certainly enjoyable. Especially when they get all sulky like this.
Click to expand...
There it is the victory dance. Undefeated in your own mind again. Remember my entrance here where you started your parsing was I claimed they all did not apply as valid examples and were exaggerations. That’s your parsing starting point. As usual you zoom in on one issue with blinders on the rest until your ultimate declaration of victory. Your reading comprehension and inference capacity sucks. I have to believe judges can’t stand you.
 
#104
#104
NorthDallas40 said:
There it is the victory dance. Undefeated in your own mind again. Remember my entrance here where you started your parsing was I claimed they all did not apply as valid examples and were exaggerations. That’s your parsing starting point. As usual you zoom in on one issue with blinders on the rest until your ultimate declaration of victory. Your reading comprehension and inference capacity sucks. I have to believe judges can’t stand you.
Click to expand...

NorthDallas40 said:
And yes you went to exaggerated examples of restricted speech to say what Jones did was not protected speech.
Click to expand...



Lol. “It’s your fault for not understanding that I meant to say something correct when I actually said something totally wrong (twice).”
 
#109
#109
RockyTop85 said:
I can’t see how beating up on people who don’t know that flag burning is protected speech would make me a “legend.”

Doing it to someone who would rather dig themselves into a hole rather than just use Google and admit they were wrong is certainly enjoyable. Especially when they get all sulky like this.
Click to expand...
Burning the US flag is protected speech. Burning a rainbow flag is a hate crime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77, davethevol and InVOLuntary
#110
#110
NorthDallas40 said:
No go read huff’s reply. He got it. You’re clearly not smart enough to absorb it. After all youre the “lawyer” that equated a jury of your peers as equal to the government when you liked his post 😂🤡
Click to expand...
Lol. You just learned five minutes ago that flag burning is protected speech. Now might be a good time to evaluate whether banking on your own repertoire of legal understanding is a good idea, given that you hilariously cry like a baby every time you’re wrong about anything.

You really think I can’t come up with a single famous civil case (from 1989 for example) involving a private individual (a pastor, for example) and a private entity (a smutty magazine, for example) where a court (the Supreme Court, for example) overturned a jury verdict based on constitutional limits (the first amendment, for example)?
 
#111
#111
RockyTop85 said:
Lol. You just learned five minutes ago that flag burning is protected speech. Now might be a good time to evaluate whether banking on your own repertoire of legal understanding is a good idea, given that you hilariously cry like a baby every time you’re wrong about anything.

You really think I can’t come up with a single famous civil case (from 1989 for example) involving a private individual (a pastor, for example) and a private entity (a smutty magazine, for example) where a court (the Supreme Court, for example) overturned a jury verdict based on constitutional limits (the first amendment, for example)?
Click to expand...
Go do a little reading “counselor”. I’ve acknowledged many times on this forum that flag burning is protected speech.

The person I replied to acknowledged my assertion. You parse and claim victory on another argument nobody was having. It’s what you do in every episode of “RT85 fights…” 🤡

And thanks for doubling down on your stupid assertion. Oh wait you just raised the government above the jury of your peers. Gee I guess we should just do away with juries then 🤡🤡
 
#112
#112
NorthDallas40 said:
Go do a little reading “counselor”. I’ve acknowledged many times on this forum that flag burning is protected speech.

The person I replied to acknowledged my assertion. You parse and claim victory on another argument nobody was having. It’s what you do in every episode of “RT85 fights…” 🤡

And thanks for doubling down on your stupid assertion. Oh wait you just raised the government above the jury of your peers. Gee I guess we should just do away with juries then 🤡🤡
Click to expand...

He did that Weezer and myself the other day..smh
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77, NorthDallas40 and InVOLuntary
#113
#113
NorthDallas40 said:
Go do a little reading “counselor”. I’ve acknowledged many times on this forum that flag burning is protected speech.

The person I replied to acknowledged my assertion. You parse and claim victory on another argument nobody was having. It’s what you do in every episode of “RT85 fights…” 🤡

And thanks for doubling down on your stupid assertion. Oh wait you just raised the government above the jury of your peers. Gee I guess we should just do away with juries then 🤡🤡
Click to expand...

1633281859785.gif

Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell, 485 US 46 - Supreme Court 1988 - Google Scholar

The District Court directed a verdict against respondent on the privacy claim, and submitted the other two claims to a jury. The jury found for petitioners on the defamation claim, but found for respondent on the claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress and awarded damages. We now consider whether this award is consistent with the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution.

…

But for reasons heretofore stated this claim cannot, consistently with the First Amendment, form a basis for the award of damages when the conduct in question is the publication of a caricature such as the ad parody involved here.
Click to expand...

Application of tort law, even if it’s common law, even if it’s done by a jury, is an application of government-made rules and government jurisdiction that will then be enforced by the government. Therefore, it must comport with the constitution. This is such an obvious and well-recognized point that even the government and courts concede that it is a limit on their authority.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic
#115
#115
RockyTop85 said:
View attachment 399253

Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell, 485 US 46 - Supreme Court 1988 - Google Scholar



Application of tort law, even if it’s common law, even if it’s done by a jury, is an application of government-made rules and government jurisdiction that will then be enforced by the government. Therefore, it must comport with the constitution. This is such an obvious and well-recognized point that even the government and courts concede that it is a limit on their authority.
Click to expand...
We should clearly just do away with juries then.
 
#118
#118
Orangeburst said:
He did that Weezer and myself the other day..smh
Click to expand...
LMAO pointing out that the chairman of the joint chiefs had more experience than you and more of a personal understanding of the individual with which he was communicating than you is parsing?

Lololol.

Tell me you’re butthurt without telling me you’re butthurt.
 
#119
#119
RockyTop85 said:
LMAO pointing out that the chairman of the joint chiefs had more experience and more of a personal understanding of the individual with which he was communicating is parsing?

Lololol.

Tell me you’re butthurt without telling me you’re butthurt.
Click to expand...
How many victories you up to now, Legend? I remember that exchange. His description is accurate. It’s what you do. The Crimson Tode is in awe of your victory declaration method 🤡
 
#120
#120
NorthDallas40 said:
How many victories you up to now, Legend? I remember that exchange. His description is accurate. It’s what you do. The Crimson Tode is in awe of your victory declaration method 🤡
Click to expand...

I’m still confused about how proving that flag burning is protected speech is “legendary” to anyone other than the guy who twice insisted that it wasn’t.

You can use Google to find these things out, you know?
 
#121
#121
RockyTop85 said:
I’m still confused about how proving that flag burning is protected speech is “legendary” to anyone other than the guy who twice insisted that it wasn’t.
Click to expand...
We can all plainly see that you’re confused we won’t acknowledge your victory in a debate nobody was having (but you).
 
#122
#122
RockyTop85 said:
LMAO pointing out that the chairman of the joint chiefs had more experience than you and more of a personal understanding of the individual with which he was communicating than you is parsing?

Lololol.

Tell me you’re butthurt without telling me you’re butthurt.
Click to expand...

Butthurt? I could care less.
You argued that we were not talking about nukes, when clearly it was in response to LG's comments.

Happy you got your jollies though
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
#124
#124
NorthDallas40 said:
We can all plainly see that you’re confused we won’t acknowledge your victory in a debate nobody was having.
Click to expand...

I can’t help that everybody else was going to just let you look like a dumbass for saying that it wasn’t protected speech. I gave you an opportunity to show that you weren’t. I wasn’t even mean about it at first.

Not sure how it’s my fault you’re incapable of just saying “yeah my bad, some of those were protected speech, he clearly wasn’t trying to label this unprotected.”

I mean I’m glad you didn’t and I knew you wouldn’t but it’s still not my fault.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top