Velo Vol
Internets Expert
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2009
- Messages
- 36,853
- Likes
- 17,289
None. There's nothing "backing" stock ETFs either if your definition of "backed" means that you can receive something physical for your shares in it. And many of the risks it mentions are inherent in all ETFs regardless of what they are designed to track, like counterparty risk. GLD is a lot like owning gold futures.And what laws might I violate if I decide to start an ETF with nothing underlying or backing it?
What the market will pay for it. Just like anything else. And the trust actually does own physical gold, by the way. The fund strikes a NAV everyday, just like any other ETF or mutual fund, that is driven by the price of the underlying assets.Then how is the ETF valued?
Or for that matter, how is any ETF valued if you don't necessarily have to possess the commodity or sector stock?
Then how is the ETF valued?
Or for that matter, how is any ETF valued if you don't necessarily have to possess the commodity or sector stock?
Again, you missed the point. It may have gold, but it doesn't have enough to cover the number of contracts written.What the market will pay for it. Just like anything else. And the trust actually does own physical gold, by the way. The fund strikes a NAV everyday, just like any other ETF or mutual fund, that is driven by the price of the underlying assets.
It's just that its shareholders don't have physical redemption rights, which is why gold bugs don't like it. Nor should they, if what they are really after is the ability to possess the physical gold. GLD is paper gold (you're buying shares in a trust, and the trust owns the physical gold). If I wanted to hold the physical gold, not just get exposure in a 401(k) to gold, I wouldn't own GLD either. If I own SPY, I can't "redeem" my shares in it for shares in each S&P 500 stock either. It's not how ETFs work.
Is GLD Really As Good As Gold?
You believe in an unfalsifiable conspiracy about it then, as gold bugs are prone to do. So there's no point in even having a discussion. At first you claimed it owned no gold directly (which isn't true), now you claim it doesn't have enough.Again, you missed the point. It may have gold, but it doesn't have enough to cover the number of contracts written.
It was an exaggeration. Lighten up. The point is that they don't have nearly enough gold. How about that?You believe in an unfalsifiable conspiracy about it then, as gold bugs are prone to do. So there's no point in even having a discussion. At first you claimed it owned no gold directly (which isn't true), now you claim it doesn't have enough.
I worry about the psychology of this - a global pandemic, while creating an incredibly scary one-month selloff, ultimately only paused a new high by about 6 months. The corona crash has a serious 1987 crash feel to it now. But it took the market something like 12 or 14 months to set a new high after that crash - this is just a few months.Agree. And we still have 10% unemployment. The markets are definitely looking way ahead.
Yea the traveler count. It’s extremely interesting to look at those #’s. Just look at 4/14 and try to imagine that...TSA?
Interest rates are just so low. I think there are a lot of people in the market because they have no other choice.I worry about the psychology of this - a global pandemic, while creating an incredibly scary one-month selloff, ultimately only paused a new high by about 6 months. The corona crash has a serious 1987 crash feel to it now. But it took the market something like 12 or 14 months to set a new high after that crash - this is just a few months.
There are a ton of people out there who can't help that the market is invincible - not that it never goes down (because it clearly does), but that every single dip is a great buying opportunity. Markets aren't "supposed" to work like that. Then again you can argue we don't have a true market in a lot of ways.