Thunder Good-Oil
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2011
- Messages
- 47,391
- Likes
- 49,341
The reality is that green energy can barely put a dent into running our country. If we are to make meaningful cuts to burning fossil fuel then it needs to be nuclear.
I do agree with that. Though I am not sure why the govt isn't putting more incentive into solar energy. I believe I read where countries like China and Israel had over 30% of all new constructions being solar powered, compared the US where I believe less than 1% of new constructions are solar powered. It's cost efficient and clean. If I built a new home, you can bet my house would be solar powered.
You're going to spend five figures installing a solar system on your house. Even if you're spending $300 a month on power it's going to take years to recoup that cost. It's also one more thing to squabble over if you go to sell the house. Who's going to want to buy a solar home if the batteries or panels need to be replaced in the next couple years?It doesn't really have to be competitive if you just do it, and that's where we're headed. People are going to buy electricity when the price goes up (and honestly it already happened). They only got one wire out there hooked to the house. (obligatory reference: 220, 221, whatever it takes). It's not a bad idea to incent homeowners to bear the capital cost on solar; they've got somewhere to put it.
I don't know about you guys, but in the last 10 years my prices per kWh has about doubled here in Kingsport with AEP. I have to pay it.
You actually make it sound pretty good. If I can spend 5 figures and save $300 a month, I’d be all over that.You're going to spend five figures installing a solar system on your house. Even if you're spending $300 a month on power it's going to take years to recoup that cost. It's also one more thing to squabble over if you go to sell the house. Who's going to want to buy a solar home if the batteries or panels need to be replaced in the next couple years?
You're going to spend five figures installing a solar system on your house. Even if you're spending $300 a month on power it's going to take years to recoup that cost. It's also one more thing to squabble over if you go to sell the house. Who's going to want to buy a solar home if the batteries or panels need to be replaced in the next couple years?
I have several ETFs on my watch lists right now. I’ve avoided funds for a couple of years since the poorly run names aren’t excluded as long as they fit the theme. But the diversification is good with the uncertainty of when the recovery kicks in and the Biden-in-Chief’s policies.
JETS: airlines
POTX: reefers
ICLN: green energy
DRIV: EVs
BETZ: sports betting
BOTZ: robotics, automation
EDOC: telehealth
FINX: finance tech
PAVE: infrastructure
I’ve held CURE for a long time. Leveraged ETFs aren’t really designed for longer term holds, but I like the demographics of the healthcare industry.
I like Blackrock (BLK), State Street (STT), Invesco (IVZ), and Schwab (SCHW) since they do a lot of business operating ETFs. I own 3 of those names.
I have an open buy order on ERX (2x leveraged energy ETF) still a couple dollars below the current price. I opened up a position in INTC yesterday a few cents over $55 that I’ve set the sell order a little above $59. I held INTC last quarter, collected the dividend, and exited with a gain of about 25%. Wash, rinse, repeat I hope.
I own every ARK ETF, and they have been killing it. They will have a new one coming soon, ARKX, that should do really well. It will be a space exploration ETF. She actually has a webinar going on right now.