Majors
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2020
- Messages
- 17,455
- Likes
- 29,138
To justify the current price this would need to be sustained for 5-10 years.
You see a split coming next quarter? Or around Q2 2024 timeline ?
Believe 25B buybacks. I think it has a chance for one another split soon….at least that’s my hope.Splits don’t seem to be very popular anymore. There are now fractional shares available on many listed company shares. Higher share prices are maybe a prestige thing nowadays. Also, don’t know if companies benefit at all by making 100 share lots affordable for retail investor participating in selling options.
I do think that they have authorized additional share buybacks.
In the heyday, Cisco was a steady money making machine.
NVDA is currently a wild swinging, hard to judge, outfit.
Splits don’t seem to be very popular anymore. There are now fractional shares available on many listed company shares. Higher share prices are maybe a prestige thing nowadays. Also, don’t know if companies benefit at all by making 100 share lots affordable for retail investor participating in selling options.
I do think that they have authorized additional share buybacks.
They will always have splits, splits are good business.
I’m only aware of 2 or 3 things that splits are good for. If writing put or call options, lower priced shares in multiples of 100 are affordable for more retail investors. If fractional shares aren’t available, then there is a better opportunity for retail investors with maybe a few hundred dollars to participate in share ownership. I’m not sure, but fractional share ownership might have fees which eat into returns. Then there’s the psychology of owning more shares. Otherwise it’s just basic math and probably costs companies more to administer than the value of benefits being generated.
So good business for firms and employees that manage the process, but not necessarily good for company bottom lines.
Obviously yes, but nobody cares much. If you tip people with 1 dollar bills, you can tip more times with smaller amounts than you can with $5 bills. The people receiving the shares don't look at the number so much as they look at the dollars. But yes, obviously, it is what it is.Wouldn't the shares owned by the company split so they have more to get rid of without losing a large % of ownership?
Obviously yes, but nobody cares much. If you tip people with 1 dollar bills, you can tip more times with smaller amounts than you can with $5 bills. The people receiving the shares don't look at the number so much as they look at the dollars. But yes, obviously, it is what it is.
A five dollar bill and five one dollar bills are roughly equivalent.
As long as AI is a thing, so will NVDA. BUT, the internet was never NOT a thing after the dot com bubble - however Nvidia isn’t making sock puppets or just adding .com to their name. The backlog is real. However the valuation indicates that there’s little tolerance built in for missteps.
I don't want to spend too much time on it, but it appears very boring. They just want to split, period. That's what it looks like.In the vein of the share split discussion, I've read that Mueller Industries (MLI) is seeking to issue more shares in order to then perform a 2-for-1 split (if I understood correctly). Right now their financials appear to be sound, so what would be the logical reason for potentially rocking the boat, so to speak?