AllState Sugar Bowl: #6 Ohio State vs. #8 Arkansas

[The Ron Mexico]

In this case cleary the NCAA is saying money is more important than the rules. So the players were not ruled ineligible. Which means that they didn't cheat.

Then why are they suspended for 5 games in 2011?

 

[SEC Nightmare]

Then why are they suspended for 5 games in 2011?

Because they broke rules. They didn't cheat.

 

[DarthVisor]

Because they broke rules. They didn't cheat.

So, you let them play now and suspend them next year when they might not even still be at tOSU?
Posted via VolNation Mobile

 

[The Ron Mexico]

Because they broke rules. They didn't cheat.

Breaking rules is cheating. At least according to the English language.

thefreedictionary.com

cheat: To violate rules deliberately, as in a game

 

[SEC Nightmare]

Breaking rules is cheating. At least according to the English language.

thefreedictionary.com

cheat: To violate rules deliberately, as in a game

Cheating refers to the overt or covert breaking of rules to gain advantage in a competitive situation

Yep I can now see how the Tatoos and selling of their own goods helped them beat Arkansas.


They didn't cheat. Get over it.

 

[SEC Nightmare]

So, you let them play now and suspend them next year when they might not even still be at tOSU?
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Hey, I'm not the one who handed down this verdict..the NCAA did. Obviously they saw $$$ to be made and and said that atleast on this night, the rules don't matter.

If it were up to me, there would ber no suspensions at all.