I keep seeing folks referring to not having NIL money before.
I'm so sick of the lies and innuendo. Stop spreading rumors and then pontificating with great bias in ignorant ways based rumors.
If that were the case, then that was a problem.
See what I mean? You had your cheap shot ready in advance and without researching the facts, used what you freely admit is hearsay and gossip to launch your attack. Why?
In order to start **** about our recent coach. Which undermines the team and present coach (the only coach we have), and does everything in your power to divide the fan base. Now if people like you fully succeed in that,
that will hurt our NIL donations.
NIL money and support from the AD should not be based on who the coach is.
Stop all of this garbage and lies and stop blaming.
NIL comes from fans and businesses. It was not even legal last year for the AD to be involved. Clearly there was NIL for the players we got from the portal. How can you be so ignorant as to not know that? Was it big enough? One hopes not as big as this year, much less next year.
The allegation that there was no NIL for high school recruiting or that its lack was the primary reason for people not signing is a completely unsubstantiated and biased rumor. You do realize there are other factors in recruiting, right? You'd better hope that recruits think CKC will accomplish things (a primary draw) and not be completely caught up in lies and in-fighting like you are.
NIL absolutely
can be based on how fans and businesses feel about the state of the program and its prospects. It's a free market.
If people are giving more now, then you should be jumping for joy instead of trying to incriminate an AD trying to boost all of our teams. And start a ruckus.
I've come to learn that most programs and teams blame "not enough NIL" when they miss on a prospect, but point to the good things about their program (and downplay NIL) when a recruit signs. Ever noticed that?
If you personally did not give to NIL last year, blame yourself. It's not owed to you or to us. It's not a hand-out. We have to generate it through our own efforts.
If there is an increase in NIL, I believe it is probably more related to players like Clark and Reece
Again you are trying to take credit away from everyone who is supporting our LVs and assigning it elsewhere.
Those two were anomalies. They were the faces of the sport that the networks were clearly using to make an all-out marketing push to promote the sport. So, national advertisers wanted to be on in that ride.
No matter how many endorsements those two sold, our NIL gets zero. That's yet another transparent attempt by you to deflect all praise away from what we are doing and assign credit elsewhere.
If you follow sports, you know (1) that most new coaches get an uptick in optimism and support because it's a new beginning. You also know that (2)
IF (and I do not claim this is true) many potential big sources of NIL did feel the old situation was played out (Note: I love Kellie), well, a fresh start would help there too. If that happened, the AD did
not do that. Do you understand that? NIL members and donors do what they want. It is independent of the athletic department. Just like you can stop, halve, maintain, double or triple your own contribution to any cause.
Instead of playing off one coach against another, you should live in the real world, accept where we are, and get behind this LV Renaissance.
The best thing you can do is join the Vol Club, get your business involved if you have one, and
contribute to the positive karma that will encourage others to join and give. Bad mouthing based on gossip kills donor enthusiasm.