hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 114,564
- Likes
- 162,734
That's a tad bit of a bastardization of my stance. My contention is that the evolution of mankind has an inevitable leftward movement. Take any increment of time and look at how society changes.Not all progress is good . Depends on how you view your world , what you want in life and how you want the world around you to be . Take for example the one like you got , Luther makes no bones about all societies eventual going further and further left . He’s good with that . My point is all societies as they have “ progressed “ have only gotten closer with every progression to their collapse as an empire or a top nation . So naturally I would assume ( if I’ve buying into Luthers theory ) all nations fail and fall because of their leftward progression . I don’t see anyone wanting to go back to the 50s at all , this generation , the times we are living in are the easiest times to live in that’s ever been on our planet . We are living in the freest , non restrictive , most mobile , most knowledge accessible society ever in the our history . How far do you want to “ progress” ? China and Russia have given up what we have for their “ progression “ what are we willing to give up ?
All those keystrokes and nobody caresThat's a tad bit of a bastardization of my stance. My contention is that the evolution of mankind has an inevitable leftward movement. Take any increment of time and look at how society changes.
Take the US and look at 1780, 1820, 1860, 1900, 1940, 1980, and 2020.
And as far as a societies collapsing. Look at what it's replaced by and what it eventually becomes.
Finally, look at the countries that have governments (religions) trying to restrict that natural movement left. The contention that all nations fail and fall because of their leftward progression is asinine. More fail from the ones with power trying to restrict the natural movement left.
Not all progress is good . Depends on how you view your world , what you want in life and how you want the world around you to be . Take for example the one like you got , Luther makes no bones about all societies eventual going further and further left . He’s good with that . My point is all societies as they have “ progressed “ have only gotten closer with every progression to their collapse as an empire or a top nation . So naturally I would assume ( if I’ve buying into Luthers theory ) all nations fail and fall because of their leftward progression . I don’t see anyone wanting to go back to the 50s at all , this generation , the times we are living in are the easiest times to live in that’s ever been on our planet . We are living in the freest , non restrictive , most mobile , most knowledge accessible society ever in the our history . How far do you want to “ progress” ? China and Russia have given up what we have for their “ progression “ what are we willing to give up ?
In the 1950's toilets flushed enough water, with one flick of the lever, to take down even the amount of crap you spew every day.I just looked it up and in 1955 Eisenhower issued an executive order that all toilets must be able to flush the president's defecation down the drain in no more than three flushes.
That's a tad bit of a bastardization of my stance. My contention is that the evolution of mankind has an inevitable leftward movement. Take any increment of time and look at how society changes.
Take the US and look at 1780, 1820, 1860, 1900, 1940, 1980, and 2020.
And as far as a societies collapsing. Look at what it's replaced by and what it eventually becomes.
Finally, look at the countries that have governments (religions) trying to restrict that natural movement left. The contention that all nations fail and fall because of their leftward progression is asinine. More fail from the ones with power trying to restrict the natural movement left.
Please keep up reb. The continuumlet me see if I have this straight ... you say all nations ( mankind ) has a natural progression to the left , and in the same breath you say most nation fall because they were trying to stop that ? Where do you see authoritarianism, monarchies , and communism on the left of center or the right of center ?
Given enough time, all nation states have failed, "progressive" or otherwise.
That wasn't the "progress" I was talking about. I was talking computers and information technology. The marriage of tech and government into the surveillance state would not be good progress, but that's a separate discussion.
AI is coming whether we what it or not. Who's going to be the global leader? And is the US workforce ready for it? I don't hear much talk of it from the presidential candidates other than Yang.
To the right in more ways than to the left.let me see if I have this straight ... you say all nations ( mankind ) has a natural progression to the left , and in the same breath you say most nation fall because they were trying to stop that ? Where do you see authoritarianism, monarchies , and communism on the left of center or the right of center ?
We were wrong on the metric system and Celsius system. Maybe not your best example.It only comes and you can’t stop it when you decide you are like the others . The United States is it’s own country , we don’t have to be like any of the others ( see metric system and Celsius system ) . Just because they are doing something doesn’t mean we have to . If we end up with a social credit system with facial recognition like China , it’s because we allowed it and it will be the worst thing we ever allowed to happen to our rights and freedoms .
I’ve never killed a baby. And The GOP is the party that cares until the baby is born then all you want to do is take away food stamps because the mom can’t afford otherwise. You are a miserable person. Seriously man I feel sorry for you and your kids if you have any.Yeah but ya'll like to kill them at 9 months and 1 minute.
I'm very happy dude. I love my country. Served as a younger man. Have a great family. We have a great president, and America is finally returning to the greatness we so richly deserve.I’ve never killed a baby. And The GOP is the party that cares until the baby is born then all you want to do is take away food stamps because the mom can’t afford otherwise. You are a miserable person. Seriously man I feel sorry for you and your kids if you have any.