Amateur Hour Continues

That's cool. Resort to name calling when you know it's the truth. Is that how you handle not having an honest rebuttal?

Moral equivalence is your schtick. It's a bit tiring because the arguments are such howlers. Because Trump, on a daily basis, does what some politician did once years ago, Trump is no different than those guys. It's like arguing that because the citizens of a nation have collectively raped, murdered, robbed, embezzled, etc., when ONE PERSON does all those things he's really no different than an random citizen. I mean, come on, you're moral equivalence arguments are such fluff.
 
If you take out TARP and the one-time stimulus, very interesting.

Trump Spending Soars in First 4 Years

president%20spending.png

So does that exclude Bush II's stimulus?
 
Moral equivalence is your schtick. It's a bit tiring because the arguments are such howlers. Because Trump, on a daily basis, does what some politician did once years ago, Trump is no different than those guys. It's like arguing that because the citizens of a nation have collectively raped, murdered, robbed, embezzled, etc., when ONE PERSON does all those things he's really no different than an random citizen. I mean, come on, you're moral equivalence arguments are such fluff.
Your Trump hate is flaring and causing you to exaggerate again. I'm sorry that my not sharing your opinion that Trump is the anti-Christ bothers you so much. Sure, he's a pompous ass, but as I've said before, he's Bill Clinton without the charisma. And I guess a filter.

He's the lawfully elected POTUS. He's done nothing actually deserving of impeachment, yet, but the Dems have tried simply because they don't like him and he hurts their feelings. At least that's how it comes across. I didn't vote for the guy. I won't vote for him in 2020. But he did win. I'm not going to make **** up and say he deserves to be impeached. If you want him out of office, win in 2020. I've said that many times, yet it doesn't seem to sink in. It's the only Constitutional remedy the Dems really have since they can't nail him on anything that rises to removal from office. But go on shouting your outrage rather than having intelligent discussion. Not sure how in the hell you could be a practicing lawyer, but whatever.
 
Don't be dramatic. No one thinks he's the anti-Christ. That implies some knowledge of Christian doctrine, which he clearly lacks.
Your Trump hate is flaring and causing you to exaggerate again. I'm sorry that my not sharing your opinion that Trump is the anti-Christ bothers you so much. Sure, he's a pompous ass, but as I've said before, he's Bill Clinton without the charisma. And I guess a filter.

He's the lawfully elected POTUS. He's done nothing actually deserving of impeachment, yet, but the Dems have tried simply because they don't like him and he hurts their feelings. At least that's how it comes across. I didn't vote for the guy. I won't vote for him in 2020. But he did win. I'm not going to make **** up and say he deserves to be impeached. If you want him out of office, win in 2020. I've said that many times, yet it doesn't seem to sink in. It's the only Constitutional remedy the Dems really have since they can't nail him on anything that rises to removal from office. But go on shouting your outrage rather than having intelligent discussion. Not sure how in the hell you could be a practicing lawyer, but whatever.
 
Don't be dramatic. No one thinks he's the anti-Christ. That implies some knowledge of Christian doctrine, which he clearly lacks.
You approach your arguments emotionally, with your political bias on full display. I look at it more logically, because whether you believe it or not, I look at both parties the same. I've never denied Trump is a dirtbag, but he's a dirtbag that won a lawful election. You don't have to like it, but at some point, the left needs to accept it.

Believe it or not, I used to argue with my dad, may he RIP, about accepting Obama. He disliked Obama with a passion. I can't tell you the number of times I had to explain to him that he shouldn't take everything he heard on Fox news as truth. But Presidents are elected, and someone is always going to be dissatisfied with who's in office.
 
You approach your arguments emotionally, with your political bias on full display. I look at it more logically, because whether you believe it or not, I look at both parties the same. I've never denied Trump is a dirtbag, but he's a dirtbag that won a lawful election. You don't have to like it, but at some point, the left needs to accept it.

Believe it or not, I used to argue with my dad, may he RIP, about accepting Obama. He disliked Obama with a passion. I can't tell you the number of times I had to explain to him that he shouldn't take everything he heard on Fox news as truth. But Presidents are elected, and someone is always going to be dissatisfied with who's in office.

Your dad sounds like a smart man
 
  • Like
Reactions: Weezer
Are you sure you're not confusing him with Eric?


No. Don Jr. just has that physical appearance, but of course he is going to delight the Trump base so it would not surprise me if he runs for office one day, or at least thinks he can.

I doubt it will be right away, though. Modern history suggests that even popular presidents are lame duck and leave with meh numbers in their second terms. And you have to think that with the animosity Trump has generally caused within the leadership of the GOP that it will be an uphill sled for him if reelected.

Consider Bush II. He ran a couple of terms later than Dad. And HRC ran well after Bill had left. Tough to see us going from one Trump to another any time soon.
 

VN Store



Back
Top