Amateur Hour Continues

#28,751
#28,751
volfanhill said:
He actively reported his concerns through the proper channels. What’s done with that info isn’t up to him. And it’s pretty funny that you are attacking one of Trumps great Generals in the process. It doesn’t concern you that all the adults have bailed on Trump? Rex, Mattis, and Kelly all bounced on this administration. I wonder why?
Click to expand...

What's the over under on Trump tweeting out that he's never met Mike Pompeo in the next 18 months?
 
#28,752
#28,752
Septic said:
He said Vindman "heard" the illegal order, not that he was given one.

Kelly said that when Vindman heard Trump tell Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that he wanted the country to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter, the ask was for the aide "tantamount to hearing 'an illegal order."

Vindman then followed procedure by reporting his concern to his superior.
Click to expand...

Then Vindman needs additional training in what constitutes an order.
 
#28,755
#28,755
I've never heard anyone say, just exactly why was Vindman on the call to begin with? Did he have something to add that no one else could?
 
#28,757
#28,757
VolStrom said:
I've never heard anyone say, just exactly why was Vindman on the call to begin with? Did he have something to add that no one else could?
Click to expand...


He was the top Ukrainian policy expert on the National Security Council.
 
#28,760
#28,760
n_huffhines said:
Indefensible stupidity.

View attachment 261436
Click to expand...
The funny thing, is how inconsistent Trump is with his rhetoric. It wasn't that long ago that he was advocating for criminal justice reform because we have too many inmates in the prison population serving mandatory life sentences for non-violent offenses and for offenses committed before they turned 18... and how these mandatory sentences disproportionately impact the black population. The Trump Campaign even ran a commercial on it during the Super Bowl. But now, he wants to execute drug dealers? Where he stands on an issue, depends entirely on who he is speaking to in that moment and his mood that day.
 
#28,762
#28,762
BowlBrother85 said:
The funny thing, is how inconsistent Trump is with his rhetoric. It wasn't that long ago that he was advocating for criminal justice reform because we have too many inmates in the prison population serving mandatory life sentences for non-violent offenses and for offenses committed before they turned 18... and how these mandatory sentences disproportionately impact the black population. The Trump Campaign even ran a commercial on it during the Super Bowl. But now, he wants to execute drug dealers? Where he stands on an issue, depends entirely on who he is speaking to in that moment and his mood that day.
Click to expand...
On one hand he likes the macho government that doesn't bother with rights and due process and stuff, but on the other hand he's convinced himself that "criminal justice reform" is going to win him a lot of black votes somewhere.

Decisions, decisions.
 
#28,764
#28,764
volfanjustin said:
That's his opportunity to speak directly to the people, Kelly is backing the traitor vindman so he deserves any criticism that comes his way
Click to expand...
Both Kelly and Vindman forgot more about loving this country and being a patriot on their worst days than Trump will ever know about it on his best day. Having differences against a President isn't traitorous. Standing up for an enemy over your country is traitorous
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
#28,765
#28,765
volfanhill said:
He actively reported his concerns through the proper channels. What’s done with that info isn’t up to him. And it’s pretty funny that you are attacking one of Trumps great Generals in the process. It doesn’t concern you that all the adults have bailed on Trump? Rex, Mattis, and Kelly all bounced on this administration. I wonder why?
Click to expand...
I’m sure he knew his pal was going to go to $hitty Schiff. Vindman is as worthless at Ciaramella. It’s funny when Trump picks these people they are all bad and evil yet when they resign or he fires them they are all of a sudden hero’s to you all on the left.
 
#28,766
#28,766
USAFgolferVol said:
Both Kelly and Vindman forgot more about loving this country and being a patriot on their worst days than Trump will ever know about it on his best day. Having differences against a President isn't traitorous. Standing up for an enemy over your country is traitorous
Click to expand...
You are right, having differences isn’t being a traitor (though according to you libs it was racist for 8 years) but trying to over throw a President over policy differences does make one a traitor. But who cares, you all lost that battle and that shameful part of our history is over
 
#28,767
#28,767
How many times did Trump get impeached for stuff that happened while Kelly was chief of staff?

How many special counsel investigations were launched against Trump because of actions that occurred while Kelly was there?
 
#28,769
#28,769
volfanjustin said:
I’m sure he knew his pal was going to go to $hitty Schiff. Vindman is as worthless at Ciaramella. It’s funny when Trump picks these people they are all bad and evil yet when they resign or he fires them they are all of a sudden hero’s to you all on the left.
Click to expand...
I championed all three of those hires. A lot on the left didn’t care for Tillerson. I thought he was a good choice. But that’s probably because I am not on the left. The only Trump original appointee I didn’t like was Education. But I think that department should be done away with.
 
#28,772
#28,772
volfanjustin said:
I’m sure he knew his pal was going to go to $hitty Schiff. Vindman is as worthless at Ciaramella. It’s funny when Trump picks these people they are all bad and evil yet when they resign or he fires them they are all of a sudden hero’s to you all on the left.
Click to expand...
You project a narrow perspective. It's tribal in nature. Everyone is either all good or all bad, depending on how easy it is for you to pigeonhole them with a label. Both your claims and your arguments are simple-minded.
 
#28,773
#28,773
BowlBrother85 said:
You project a narrow perspective. It's tribal in nature. Everyone is either all good or all bad, depending on how easy it is for you to pigeonhole them with a label. Both your claims and your arguments are simple-minded.
Click to expand...
Not everyone is all good but yes all you radical leftists are all bad.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top