lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 71,844
- Likes
- 42,488
Have you checked the demographics of the shooter?
4 dead, 9 wounded. What's this, the second full week of school ? Off to a strong start with the NRA body count total for the year.
Shooter reporter 14 years old. A 14 year old able to obtain a gun. Sheesz.
At least this one will result in some sensible reforms. Except it won't.
4 dead, 9 wounded. What's this, the second full week of school ? Off to a strong start with the NRA body count total for the year.
Shooter reporter 14 years old. A 14 year old able to obtain a gun. Sheesz.
At least this one will result in some sensible reforms. Except it won't.
How do you decide on which ones to give the NRA credit for?
4 dead, 9 wounded. What's this, the second full week of school ? Off to a strong start with the NRA body count total for the year.
Shooter reporter 14 years old. A 14 year old able to obtain a gun. Sheesz.
At least this one will result in some sensible reforms. Except it won't.
It is amazing how the very second a shooting is announced; the VERY FIRST THING going through the mind of a liberal is “gun control” (or now “gun SAFETY” since they figured out the previous term is a vote loser).
Not even a glancing thought toward mental health screening, improved physical security, brewer reporting or prevention requirements. No by golly, DISARM THE PUBLIC!!!!
Then we wind up like Britain or Germany; where violence continues without guns and now Germany is actually (I am not making this up) starting “knife control”.
Eventually they will have to start banning sharp sticks and rocks over 1” (2.54 cm for the European) in diameter.
When that fails and people revert to fist de cuffs, I imagine we will all have to wear handcuffs and leg shackles whenever leaving our homes.
But all the time, politicians and celebrities will of course retain their fully armed security details.
Pretty sure there are already laws against shooting people. pretty sure most states require you be 18 to own a fire arm legally. pretty sure we already have more civilians firearms owned then the major armies of the world combined. pretty sure you can call any drug dealer and get a gun regardless to background in most cities in America. In other words I am sure these sensible "reforms" will do nil, except make it harder for law abiding citizens to defend themselves from the same nutcases. What I am also pretty sure of is that most likely like the previous shooters we'll find out they were on psychoactive medications, SSRIs, SNRIs, etc but becuase of the billions paid to media outlets by big pharma none will mention how this played a part, or continues to cause increased suicide ideation. Why? Because that makes people billions and those billions go to media and politician pockets. Then we'll just have to see if the FBI was "aware" of the shooter, and how many DC phones made frequent visits to their home before the shooting in the run up to the election. Everybody wants something to change, but no one wants to talk about the giant elephant in the room with these events and the anti-depressent Pharma production line.
Except almost none are committed by an nra member or one who is even likely to be targeted for membership. I realize how inconvenient it is to actually go after the cause but most of these categorized as mass shootings have a common denominatorI begin with the premise that they are all credited to the NRA. You want to claim some are not, make your case.
because pretty much none of the shootings have been by a member of the NRA. and at least with school shootings I don't even think the NRA has proposed anything that would have lead to these shootings.I begin with the premise that they are all credited to the NRA. You want to claim some are not, make your case.