livefaith
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2007
- Messages
- 17,287
- Likes
- 19,111
Tell me you don’t know what you are talking about without telling me you don’t know what you are talking about.
Pete didn't have the benefit of the 3 point shot
From end to end, yes. That is as a ball handler, passer, shooter combination. But the greatest basketball player of all time, no. It’s really hard to judge him on a comparative basis for reasons pointed out above-unrestricted shooting green light, dad as coach, only good player on his team, so a lot of the load on his shoulders. I think in the game today, if he were playing and my team was throwing in the ball under the other teams goal down by one or two points, there is no player that I’d rather have bring the ball up the court than Pete Maravich. Bernard King would be in the running for best all time collegiate player.You believe Pete Maravich is the greatest basketball player of all-time?
NoShould the NCAA really count stats as records for players getting to play 5 full years during Covid era? I think this is crazy but wonder what you guys believe to be fair. Davis is 3 points short of Pistol Pete and now lobbying to play in the CBI tourney basically so he can break the record.
How could anyone realistically lay claim to a career record when they know they had an extra 30+ games in a 5th season?
More like 38 shots per game. He shot just below 44% his career.I hope he breaks it. It's basically the record that's been held forever because no one else in NCAA history was allowed to play how Pete was. He took 54 combined shots/ft per game and was a low percentage chucker the whole time. There's been a lot of people that if you gave them that many shots and didn't really care about wins vs losses, who could have scored how Pete did. Jackson as LSU averaged 30 a game on about half the shot attempts it took for Pete to average 44.