jinxyrabbitt
Junior Member
- Joined
- May 6, 2005
- Messages
- 28
- Likes
- 0
Originally posted by IBleedOrange24/7@Jul 22, 2005 12:15 AM
I could only assume doing well?
Who was it, id read about the other day. Ainge or JC with tendinitis?
[snapback]116897[/snapback]
Originally posted by jinxyrabbitt@Jul 21, 2005 11:00 PM
i was wondering if anyone has heard how john crompton is doing, he is from my hometown, and he was a man amongst boys in high school
[snapback]116816[/snapback]
Originally posted by BeltwayVol@Jul 23, 2005 11:00 PM
I thought I was clear in that I felt that he was/is good enough to play ahead of Ainge/Clausen.
[snapback]117333[/snapback]
Originally posted by BeltwayVol@Jul 23, 2005 8:00 PM
I thought I was clear in that I felt that he was/is good enough to play ahead of Ainge/Clausen.
I think Phil could stick with the two-QB system, and it would not shock me to see Clausen start the UAB game, (He loves starting the seniors early on, see Joey Matthews) and then I think that Crompton can beat out Ainge for the other spot. Has nothing to do with anything except I think that Jon has that type of talent and drive, and grasp of Tennessee's playbook.
[snapback]117333[/snapback]
Originally posted by GAVol@Jul 23, 2005 8:15 PM
Yeah, I got that and I really hope he's as good as you seem to think he is. I've never seen anything except stats and recruiting video of Crompton, so I personally have no basis to really say whether he can or can't win the job. I'm just going off the conventional wisdom that says that no matter what a kid did in high school, you are in trouble if you are playing freshmen at QB. Sometimes, I don't think people realize just how outrageous it was last year that we played freshmen all year and won 10 games.
[snapback]117338[/snapback]
Originally posted by milohimself@Jul 23, 2005 11:17 PM
What about Ainge? You'd rather piss away his scholarship to start a true freshman when it's unnecesary at best?
[snapback]117339[/snapback]
Originally posted by milohimself@Jul 23, 2005 11:19 PM
And it was only because we had the co-starters with contrasting styles. It's not that they outplayed defenses, it's that other teams didn't know how to prepare.
If we had went with either one of them full-time, we would be looking at maybe 7 wins at best last season.
[snapback]117342[/snapback]
Originally posted by milohimself@Jul 23, 2005 11:19 PM
And it was only because we had the co-starters with contrasting styles. It's not that they outplayed defenses, it's that other teams didn't know how to prepare.
If we had went with either one of them full-time, we would be looking at maybe 7 wins at best last season.
[snapback]117342[/snapback]