lukeneyland
God Save the Heup
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2012
- Messages
- 5,523
- Likes
- 8,779
You could definitely be right, I'm really hung up on that LA.Tech game though
I remember McNeal's team couldn't stay within 30 of us either, unfortunately that's been reversed though.Reggie McNeal's teams were percieved to be world beaters to a certain degree. Similar to what many are expecting/predicting/anticipating. The diffrence is coaching across the board and the system that is played.
You could compare McNeal and Johnny only to a certain degree. They were/are both very dynamic and elusive, but one had a coach that seemed to tie an anchor around him. Sumlin will run "3rd and Johnny" from just about anywhere on the field and expect it to succeed. I think we all saw that last year, and he gradually opened the playbook up.
TO be brief, I dont think anyone really knows how much Kevin has mastered the "air raid" and they certainly didnt respect it last year. Have they figured it out over the off season? How much more does he have in the book we havnt seen? Do you really think Johnny hasnt gotten better? The recievers gotten better?
McNeal's team couldnt stay within 30 of Johnny's ie: Fran couldnt stay within 30 of Kevin
You are...it's easy to ding a good team for playing down to its competition instead of looking at their body of work.
If you're looking for consistency in college kids week in and week out, chances are you will be routinely disappointed. Motivation is different from one week to the next.
Nonsense...Texas produces too many quality football players for TAMU to fall off the map, especially with Mack Brown doing all he can to run Texas into the ground before he retires.
Sumlin's worst season at Houston was 5-7, and he followed up that season with a 12-win and 11-win season before taking the Texas A&M job.
Chizik had a couple 3-win seasons and a 2-win season at Iowa State before taking the AU job.
Sumlin is on a different planet than Chizik.
Sumlin can coach AND recruit. He knows what he is doing. They'll be around for awhile.
The sad part is that UT could be in TAMU's position had Hamilton went after Sumlin instead of Dooley.
This is just straight-up foolish. Was there a Manziel style player on the team at the time? Or a Case Keenum level QB?? Sumlin has taken over 2 situations way different, than UT at the time. So saying we would be at the level of success that tamu had last year is just not a rational thought.
Last season tamu had an unknown factor no one could prepare for. FL had no clue about him so they couldn't prepare for him. Remember tamu's 1st game was suppose to be LA Tech. Manziel being a total surprise is a huge factor. Teams now know about him and will prepare for him throughout the spring, summer and up to that game. Going to be totally different this yr, and wouldn't be surprised if Manziel gets hurt or doesn't play for behavioral reasons or frankly the implementations of an actually playbook could boggle him down with thinking to much.
Just all imho that's all...
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Did I say it was a given? I said "could". UT was a tougher job than TAMU at the time. Had Sumlin taken over at UT, he'd be going on year four. I doubt he would have went 10-2 his first year at UT.
But I bet UT would not have three straight losing seasons with Sumlin at the helm.