Are we going to drop out of the UN?

#1

lawgator1

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
71,997
Likes
42,564
#1
Haley's speech sure hints at it. Or at least that we won't fund it anymore. We fund 22 percent of it now, plus 28 percent of the peacekeeping operations.

Why is this always such a popular target for the neocons? Just because they publicly vote against us, with no teeth to any of it, is no reason to undermine an institution which has often served US interests.

Newsflash, Donny: World leaders won't suck up to you like your lackeys in the Congress.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#3
#3
Saudia Arabia is head of the Human Rights Council. It's a joke.


You can find all sorts of things to criticize within it, no doubt. But so what? Its designed to allow for baby steps for these countries. Better that than not have a collective place to communicate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#4
#4
You say it's a popular target for Neocons.

Why do liberals think we should be adopting everything that comes out of the UN?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#5
#6
#6
You say it's a popular target for Neocons.

Why do liberals think we should be adopting everything that comes out of the UN?


Link that "liberals" say we "should be adopting everything that comes out of the UN"?

Like I said, you can find individual things you like or don't like. Some we might even agree on.

That is hardly the point. You can't just go around in the world community and jettison every institution that disagrees with you. And let's face it, there is plenty of controversy over Trump's move, even within the US, and even within the GOP or the Dems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#7
#7
And let's face facts, LG. Had Obama brought up cutting funding to the UN, you would have creamed yourself and applauded the effort as a great step for our nation.

Perhaps if you weren't such a partisan ****, you would see decreasing funding could be a good thing...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#8
#8
Link that "liberals" say we "should be adopting everything that comes out of the UN"?

Like I said, you can find individual things you like or don't like. Some we might even agree on.

That is hardly the point. You can't just go around in the world community and jettison every institution that disagrees with you. And let's face it, there is plenty of controversy over Trump's move, even within the US, and even within the GOP or the Dems.

I'm on mobile at the moment having some glorious bigot filed and racist Chick-fil-A. I'll have to link later.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#11
#11
And let's face facts, LG. Had Obama brought up cutting funding to the UN, you would have creamed yourself and applauded the effort as a great step for our nation.

Perhaps if you weren't such a partisan ****, you would see decreasing funding could be a good thing...


False
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#12
#12
Aren’t we supposed to be trimming the defense budget? Seems like cutting out what we shouldn’t be paying for is a great place to start. Europe is the brother that thinks you should chip in more for mom’s Christmas present because you make more money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#17
#17
Haley's speech sure hints at it. Or at least that we won't fund it anymore. We fund 22 percent of it now, plus 28 percent of the peacekeeping operations.

Why is this always such a popular target for the neocons? Just because they publicly vote against us, with no teeth to any of it, is no reason to undermine an institution which has often served US interests.

Newsflash, Donny: World leaders won't suck up to you like your lackeys in the Congress.

We could only hope that we pull out of the U.N :clapping: That bunch hates our guts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#20
#20
Haley's speech sure hints at it. Or at least that we won't fund it anymore. We fund 22 percent of it now, plus 28 percent of the peacekeeping operations.

Why is this always such a popular target for the neocons? Just because they publicly vote against us, with no teeth to any of it, is no reason to undermine an institution which has often served US interests.

Newsflash, Donny: World leaders won't suck up to you like your lackeys in the Congress.

Who would fund it if the US dropped out?
 
#21
#21
You can find all sorts of things to criticize within it, no doubt. But so what? Its designed to allow for baby steps for these countries. Better that than not have a collective place to communicate.

Wtf?!

Collective place to communicate?! Lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#25
#25
After sitting in the DMV all afternoon, I have decided we need less bureaucracy. So let's leave the UN and be pals with Canada.

The DMV has turned me into an anarchist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people

VN Store



Back
Top