K-town Vol Fan
Blood Runneth Orange
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2005
- Messages
- 19,872
- Likes
- 28,505
I am Reaganite..Trust but verify.
What in hell is the problem with a full blown audit? Sure, I get it, attack the auditors, but I dont trust anything without verification, unlike yourself who spouts "anonymous sources" from the WaPo and NYT. You thrived on that **** for 5 years, and still do.
It's because most people don't understand audits and purpose.That’s the exact argument the opposition to your argument is making. They argued in court that no audits have been done. and 2nd why would you trust anyone to audit themselves?
All auditors should be hired by the people making the complaint.
That’s the exact argument the opposition to your argument is making. They argued in court that no audits have been done. and 2nd why would you trust anyone to audit themselves?
All auditors should be hired by the people making the complaint.
Then how come all major news outlets aren't allowed to cover it?
Why? Why would I do that?Fine, you don't with to acknowledge the false basis of the FISA warrants that are the foundation of the appointment.
Of the principal rationale Rosenstein's memo provides for the appointment, IYO which of them support a factual basis for criminal investigation that DOJ should not handle and require a SC?
That’s the exact argument the opposition to your argument is making. They argued in court that no audits have been done. and 2nd why would you trust anyone to audit themselves?
All auditors should be hired by the people making the complaint.
You’d be singing very different tune had Trump won. Then the Russian interference would’ve been cranked up to even higher levels, not to mention the violence from those that aren’t used to not getting their way.The United States system of elections does not have a problem with SYSTEMIC voter fraud. There will always be isolated, individual cases of it... and that goes for both parties.
I believe you’re definitely barking up the right tree. I don’t think this Dominion thing likely has any legs, certainly none that can be proven. There’s no question laws were changed in states that led to more mail in voting and thus Biden’s victory. It’ll be interesting to see what happens going forward but my gut tells me Reps better get on board with mail in voting and make it work for them in the same way Dems did or they’ll never win again.Here is part of what happened and Clinton gave an indication that this was going to occur.
Toward the end of October/first of November the democrat lawyers around the country started filling subpoenas to be given voter rolls for anyone that has gotten a mail in ballot but it was not returned.
This way they knew who and where to look for harvesting, etc. That is how they knew it would be a bunch of late filed mail in ballots that came in for Biden and petitioned for mail in's to be accepted after election day in some cases up to 7 days.
Hillary basically gave this away when she told Jo not to fold the tent on election night.
Democrats had positioned lawyers around the country months in advance. We know that was done because it was news leading up to the election. What we didn't know is one of the goals was to get the voter lists. That is why there was a strong push on their side for mail in ballots. Covid brought all of it together and wrapped it in a bow.
How do I know - because they filed a lawsuit in Tn that was rejected.
Edit: To add to it, I will present Exhibit A if anyone questions this public record.
The democrats had no shot at the State of Tennessee, but what it did was expose a strategy at the top levels. Apply this tactic to states where election rules were changed in the last weeks or months unconstitutionally in some cases in those states or in states decided by thousands of votes and there you have it.
To be fair, working a polling location is very different than auditing. On the surface it does seem off to me that an audit firm would ask for volunteers but that may be common practice in the world of election auditing due to the sheer size. I’m not certain. In any audit I’ve ever seen (financial, IRS, insurance exposures) it would highly unusual. Although, sometimes the auditors are so dumb you’d think they’re volunteers.What a Bunch of two-faced liars this bunch is. They can't even keep track of the lies they say
To be fair, working a polling location is very different than auditing. On the surface it does seem off to me that an audit firm would ask for volunteers but that may be common practice in the world of election auditing due to the sheer size. I’m not certain. In any audit I’ve ever seen (financial, IRS, insurance exposures) it would highly unusual. Although, sometimes the auditors are so dumb you’d think they’re volunteers.
No, I wouldn't. I have never questioned the legitimacy of Trump's victory in 2016. I do believe that there was a coordinated effort between members of the 2016 Trump Campaign (Paul Manafort and Rick Gates) and Russian operatives (Konstantin Kilimnik, chief among them) to smear Hillary Clinton on social media... but I don't believe that it had any impact at all on the outcome of the 2016 Presidential Election. I have said so many times, in many different threads. You are projecting your own beliefs and behavior onto others.You’d be singing very different tune had Trump won. Then the Russian interference would’ve been cranked up to even higher levels, not to mention the violence from those that aren’t used to not getting their way.