Assuming BO wins, congrats to the following:

#26
#26
So you're of the opinion the Bush raised gas prices and single handedly crippled our economy?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Nobody singlehandedly does anything. However, without the money wasted on a pointless war in Iraq, the budget would look a whole lot better.
 
#27
#27
Does that mean we send condolences to:
Idiot Evangelicals
CEOs Who Ship Jobs To Indonesia
Chicken Hawks Wearing Flag Pins On Their Lapels
Mobil/Exxon
The KKK
Rush Limpdick
B'nai Brith
The Idle Rich

sans the KKK, I'll take this crowd all day over those awaiting government solutions, and it isn't close.

It's odd that your list poses little risk to America and Americans (again, save the KKK, who might equate to terrorists), while the other poses risks of almost every kind to America.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#28
#28
Does that mean we send condolences to:
Idiot Evangelicals
CEOs Who Ship Jobs To Indonesia
Chicken Hawks Wearing Flag Pins On Their Lapels
Mobil/Exxon
The KKK
Rush Limpdick
B'nai Brith
The Idle Rich

You don't have to be a jerk...sorry ALL of us ''evangelicals'' are idiots.
 
#29
#29
Actually, it is. Every Republican taking it in the face tonight can thank their beloved Commander In Chump.
Wrong again, Hat. You are on a roll, tonight.

If BHO wins tonight, the blame can be laid upon all the Republican congressman, along with W, who held office at any point from 2000-2006.

Unfortunately, the majority of the ignorant voting masses fail to understand the age old and time tested maxim:

Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely.
 
#30
#30
Nobody singlehandedly does anything. However, without the money wasted on a pointless war in Iraq, the budget would look a whole lot better.

Fair enough. You're absolutely entitled to your own opinion.

But where have you been in the Politics forum all along?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#31
#31
sans the KKK, I'll take this crowd all day over those awaiting government solutions, and it isn't close.

It's odd that your list poses little risk to America and Americans (again, save the KKK, who might equate to terrorists), while the other poses risks of almost every kind to America.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I'd say having Chicken Hawks like Bush and his band of imbeciles making decisions on how to misuse the military really hasn't helped the nation much.
 
#32
#32
I'd say having Chicken Hawks like Bush and his band of imbeciles making decisions on how to misuse the military really hasn't helped the nation much.

Would you rather it be decimated like under Clinton?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#34
#34
I'd say having Chicken Hawks like Bush and his band of imbeciles making decisions on how to misuse the military really hasn't helped the nation much.
remind me where it hurts even remotely as close as the gutting that Clinton did to our military and intelligence services, a legacy which boasts 9/11 as its greatest day.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#37
#37
remind me where it hurts even remotely as close as the gutting that Clinton did to our military and intelligence services, a legacy which boasts 9/11 as its greatest day.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Clinton's failings are obvious. However, they are no worse than waging a pointless war for going on 7 years now. The body counts are getting pretty comparable.
 
#39
#39
Just was curious as to your opinion actually.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I would like a military strong and flexible enough to handle necessary missions like Afghanistan run by people smart enough to avoid starting wars because "he tried to kill my daddy" and based on what dubious intelligence tells them.
 
#40
#40
remind me where it hurts even remotely as close as the gutting that Clinton did to our military and intelligence services, a legacy which boasts 9/11 as its greatest day.
Posted via VolNation Mobil

The first two pages of Ron Suskinds book blow this little theory out of the water. And unless Bob Woodward's book was a complete fabrication it backs it up. While we are at it, I also guess we should consider Richard Clark a complete Bush hating partisan liar as well if we want to suscribe to this nonsense. Bush was warned several times by his national security team during the spring and summer before 9/11 about Al Queda and an impending attack and chose to do nothing about it.

...but hey, Iraq was obviously a legitimate threat to the U.S., that is all that really matters.
 
#42
#42
The first two pages of Ron Suskinds book blow this little theory out of the water. And unless Bob Woodward's book was a complete fabrication it backs it up. While we are at it, I also guess we should consider Richard Clark a complete Bush hating partisan liar as well if we want to suscribe to this nonsense. Bush was warned several times by his national security team during the spring and summer before 9/11 about Al Queda and an impending attack and chose to do nothing about it.

...but hey, Iraq was obviously a legitimate threat to the U.S., that is all that really matters.

I'm telling you that gutting our intelligence services had a massively larger role than the garbage you're sourcing. They blow nothing out of the water and are dubious at best.

Assuming they're right, such warnings would have been little more than noise given the level and quality of any intelligence supporting them
but maybe you don' understand actionable intelligence or the absolute need for corroboration.

Piecing together 9/11, given the shrunken and disjointed state of our intel services at the time would have been nearly impossible had we even considered looking.

Finally, your three sources are all partisan types, with Clark being head idiot.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 

VN Store



Back
Top