hatvol96
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2005
- Messages
- 49,979
- Likes
- 18
Does that mean we send condolences to:
Idiot Evangelicals
CEOs Who Ship Jobs To Indonesia
Chicken Hawks Wearing Flag Pins On Their Lapels
Mobil/Exxon
The KKK
Rush Limpdick
B'nai Brith
The Idle Rich
Wrong again, Hat. You are on a roll, tonight.Actually, it is. Every Republican taking it in the face tonight can thank their beloved Commander In Chump.
I'd say having Chicken Hawks like Bush and his band of imbeciles making decisions on how to misuse the military really hasn't helped the nation much.sans the KKK, I'll take this crowd all day over those awaiting government solutions, and it isn't close.
It's odd that your list poses little risk to America and Americans (again, save the KKK, who might equate to terrorists), while the other poses risks of almost every kind to America.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
remind me where it hurts even remotely as close as the gutting that Clinton did to our military and intelligence services, a legacy which boasts 9/11 as its greatest day.I'd say having Chicken Hawks like Bush and his band of imbeciles making decisions on how to misuse the military really hasn't helped the nation much.
Clinton's failings are obvious. However, they are no worse than waging a pointless war for going on 7 years now. The body counts are getting pretty comparable.remind me where it hurts even remotely as close as the gutting that Clinton did to our military and intelligence services, a legacy which boasts 9/11 as its greatest day.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I would like a military strong and flexible enough to handle necessary missions like Afghanistan run by people smart enough to avoid starting wars because "he tried to kill my daddy" and based on what dubious intelligence tells them.Just was curious as to your opinion actually.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
remind me where it hurts even remotely as close as the gutting that Clinton did to our military and intelligence services, a legacy which boasts 9/11 as its greatest day.
Posted via VolNation Mobil
The first two pages of Ron Suskinds book blow this little theory out of the water. And unless Bob Woodward's book was a complete fabrication it backs it up. While we are at it, I also guess we should consider Richard Clark a complete Bush hating partisan liar as well if we want to suscribe to this nonsense. Bush was warned several times by his national security team during the spring and summer before 9/11 about Al Queda and an impending attack and chose to do nothing about it.
...but hey, Iraq was obviously a legitimate threat to the U.S., that is all that really matters.