I would have hated to be the one who did that piece.. there is soo much uncertainty at a lot of places regarding the qb position that you can't get a real handle on sec qb rankings. the fact that coker got top 5 says throw the list out.. he has done nothing to be ranked that high. he is going to bama so he has that ranking, it's not due to anything he has done or shown.
I hate when a guy gets ranked only on the team he is on rather than what he has accomplished.
the top 4 is pretty easy.. they are the only returning starters where we have some type of history to draw from. hutson mason also has game experience and in his 1st two starts avg over 300 years per game so at least we have some sample size with him even though it's small. maybe vol fans disagree, but I think dobbs is the better qb.. no offense meant to Worley, but he might not even be the starter midseason. the rest of the guys are the top 4 soo many questions that in reality it is very difficult to come up with any sec qb pecking order. even with that after reading some of the reasoning for their picks, a horrible piece by Athlon.