BearCat204
Second Chances
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2008
- Messages
- 68,700
- Likes
- 48,973
Yes they are suggesting that. Anyone who suggest either side of that spectrum are just very ignorant. Still dumb as hell to be illegal and less harmful to the body than many legal drugs.
I'm not arguing it's legal status, I'm simply reporting what physicians who specialize in disorders of the brain tell me. If you disagree with them, then so be it. I'm sure your years of medical training and research is equal to theirs.
What are you arguing then? If you are arguing that marijuana is more harmful to the body than alcohol, then you and those 2 "physicians" are just plain dumb. I never argued or said marijuana is harmless, but it's not the body eating drug like some are wanting it to be.
What are you arguing then? If you are arguing that marijuana is more harmful to the body than alcohol, then you and those 2 "physicians" are just plain dumb. I never argued or said marijuana is harmless, but it's not the body eating drug like some are wanting it to be.
You can beleive that alcohol is more harmful to the body than marijuana.I'm all for challenging "experts" but it's seems that challenging neurologist about the effects of long term effects from "weed" is a little bit of a stretch...
Marijuana is an illegal drug, a gateway drug, and extremely harmful.
In a court of law, a neurologist would be called an expert witness when discussing the effects marijuana has on the brain. So yes, on this topic it should be taken as gospel.