Mostly, the anti-Cutcliffe crowd will point to his final year at Ole Miss, after Manning graduated and the Rebels went 4-7, which apparently was enough to fire a guy whose teams had won four of five bowl games and 44 of 73 games overall.
Those same critics will argue, with some justification, that Cutcliffe left successor Ed Orgeron with a bare cupboard, further proof that Coach Cut is only as good as his quarterback.
And all of those arguments have a certain amount of merit. But recruiting to Ole Miss isnt the same as recruiting to Alabama, which has a 92,000-seat stadium, a campus out of "Gone with the Wind" and no worse than the second most storied history in all of college football, behind Notre Dame. For all those who say the Tides stature isnt what it used to be, it could be equally argued that only a program as powerful as Alabama could survive five coaching changes in 10 years, plus a couple of major scandals in that time frame, and still log three 10-win seasons since 1999. The lesson isnt how bad Bamas become, but how good the Tide have remained in the face of numerous obstacles.
And before anyone makes too much of Cutcliffes pedestrian head coaching record, consider that the last Tide coach to win a national championship Gene Stallings had a losing career record at both Texas A&M and the NFL before taking over at the Capstone.
No, it wouldnt be a sexy hire on the order of Spurrier or Saban. But the Tide doesnt need sexy. It needs solid. It needs character and class and substance. It needs Cutcliffe, the last of Bears Boys likely to look upon the Tide program as a dreamland rather than a nightmare.