Voljayton
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2019
- Messages
- 1,608
- Likes
- 2,422
Did he maximize Penix or vice versa?
Lanning is a great coach, but I don’t think ties with Saban will help the new hire. I know Saban’s top choice was the man they hired. De Boer does a lot more with a lot less.I personally think Lanning was a better candidate just by having coached under Saban at Bama.
If you’re continually saying that, someone should restart you.I disagree. He seems like a good coach. But Sark/Lanning was the best possible scatter scenario for them, imo.
But as I continually say, it doesn't matter who they hire. They probably won't be there in 4 years.
Exactly. This guy beat Lanning twice this year, wins everywhere he's been, and maximizes talent. It's not like Washington had a top 15 ranking. Penix helped, but he'll be able to pull 5 start talent more frequently than when he was with Washington. Me personally, he was the only one I did not want them to hire. Hope I'm wrongLanning is a great coach, but I don’t think ties with Saban will help the new hire. I know Saban’s top choice was the man they hired. De Boer does a lot more with a lot less.