Bang Shootie conversation

#1,476
#1,476
rocytop2624 said:
I thought I saw the switch and auto and 2 other sumptins. And I didn't know it was yurs.
Click to expand...
No problem.
If full auto ever becomes legal then it’s an easy adaptation on that gun. But……full auto is completely ineffective and unnecessary unless you’re in a need for inaccurate suppressing fire. There’s a reason that all the illegal guns recovered from criminals are never full auto. Because it’s worthless for any sort of actual combat activity.

And……there’s a completely legal alternative known as a binary trigger system.
 
#1,479
#1,479
82_VOL_83 said:
So you are good for them charging us for 2A rights but note voting rights. Thanks Rusty got it.
Click to expand...
Your anger has unbalanced you, young padawan. I haven’t advocated a gun tax. I oppose poll taxes. The government already collected sales taxes on my purchases of guns and ammo. I will abide broadly applied sales taxes.
 
#1,480
#1,480
I am open to considering special licensing or permits for certain firearms. For example, collectors of vintage firearms would undergo a rigorous licensing/permitting procedure to own a fully functioning Thompson’s sub machine gun. Gun range owners might undergo even more rigorous processes to be able to provide patrons supervised opportunities to fire fully automatic weapons. I’d be attentive to any such proposals.
 
#1,486
#1,486
Tin Man said:
Your anger has unbalanced you, young padawan. I haven’t advocated a gun tax. I oppose poll taxes. The government already collected sales taxes on my purchases of guns and ammo. I will abide broadly applied sales taxes.
Click to expand...
As usual, you miss the point. Blinded by your self-righteous ramblings. Catch a clue fossil.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Behr, rocytop2624 and 508mikey
#1,487
#1,487
82_VOL_83 said:
As usual, you miss the point. Blinded by your self-righteous ramblings. Catch a clue fossil.
Click to expand...
No, penis breath, you’ve not conveyed your point clearly. Oppose “gun taxes” I do. Where is an argument between us, there? Oppose poll taxes I do. If you are more than cynical there, we may have an argument. If you think a poll tax may save you from other attempts by governing bodies to tax gun ownership, you’re a “doo doo head.”
 
#1,488
#1,488
Tin Man said:
No, penis breath, you’ve not conveyed your point clearly. Oppose “gun taxes” I do. Where is an argument between us, there? Oppose poll taxes I do. If you are more than cynical there, we may have an argument. If you think a poll tax may save you from other attempts by governing bodies to tax gun ownership, you’re a “doo doo head.”
Click to expand...
Swing and a miss, strike 2. I see your artistic use of insults indicates you are grasping.

Listen, I oppose getting beat by Bama every year too, but my "opposition" means nothing. To beat Bama, you beat them at their own game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Behr and rocytop2624
#1,489
#1,489
82_VOL_83 said:
As usual, you miss the point. Blinded by your self-righteous ramblings. Catch a clue fossil.
Click to expand...
No, penis breath, you’ve not conveyed your point clearly. Oppose “gun taxes” I do. Where is an argument between us, there? Oppose poll taxes I do. If you are more than cynical there, we may have an argument. If you think a poll tax may save you from other attempts by governing bodies to tax gun ownership, you’re a “doo doo head.”
82_VOL_83 said:
Swing and a miss, strike 2. I see your artistic use of insults indicates you are grasping.

Listen, I oppose getting beat by Bama every year too, but my "opposition" means nothing. To beat Bama, you beat them at their own game.
Click to expand...
You failed to acknowledge the pop culture references. You’re no fun. I’m not grasping for anything. Poll taxes are no answer to whatever ill you perceive.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top