Bible War!

#51
#51
I don't know...ever heard of gay marriage? Or maybe the anti-abortion people are doing it out of concern for the mother?

It sounds like to me you just have a problem with Christianity in general. I'm not you, so I could be wrong, but that's the impression I get. The only topic that may include religion IMO is gay marriage, simply because many believe it's an institution from God. My view on abortion has nothing to do with my religion... that has nothing to do with me beliving that Jesus is the Son of God etc.
 
#52
#52
I don't know...ever heard of gay marriage? Or maybe the anti-abortion people are doing it out of concern for the mother?

I find no problem whatsoever being against gay marriage or being against abortion and never bringing the Bible into the matter.
 
#54
#54
Oh, I thought this might be another thread about religion causing wars..
 
#55
#55
because of posts like this

Our schools should not be teaching 6th graders to experiment sexually. And evolution being taught as fact is wrong in and of itself. Unless it can be proven as fact it cannot be fact. It can be taught as a theory, but even then you need to arm the kids with the other side of the debate or not teach it at all. What is wrong with my argument here pj?
 
#56
#56
I find no problem whatsoever being against gay marriage or being against abortion and never bringing the Bible into the matter.

I agree totally, it seems to be that people throw religion into it when it's not warranted.

See what you did pj? You made me agree with allvol. :p
 
#59
#59
It sounds like to me you just have a pronlem with Christianity in general. I'm not you, so I could be wrong, but that's the impression I ger. The only topic that may include religion IMO is gay amrriage, simply because many believe it's an institution from God. My view on abortion has nothing to do with my religion... that ahs nothing to do with me beliving that Jesus is the Son of God etc.

I have no issue with Christianity as a whole but I do have a problem when people try and use it to interfere with the freedoms this country in founded on. It is no one's job to make the judgments they believe God is responsible for but many think it is. I feel if more religious people that are so concerned with everyone else would put those efforts into their own home then the country would be better off. I know I have a hard enough time taking care of me and my fiance and want no part in someone else's life choices.
 
#60
#60
I have no issue with Christianity as a whole but I do have a problem when people try and use it to interfere with the freedoms this country in founded on. It is no one's job to make the judgments they believe God is responsible for but many think it is. I feel if more religious people that are so concerned with everyone else would put those efforts into their own home then the country would be better off. I know I have a hard enough time taking care of me and my fiance and want no part in someone else's life choices.

How are my views forcing religion down anyone's throat? If anything, aren't beliefs such as yours being forced down mine? I'm just saying I don't want to force my religionon anyone, but at the same time laws come from morality.
 
#61
#61
I do think gay marriage and race type issues are a difficult issue for a republic like ours, where majority rule inherently disadvantages the minority.

It does pose an interesting question about where does popular opinion apply in law.
 
#62
#62
I have no issue with Christianity as a whole but I do have a problem when people try and use it to interfere with the freedoms this country in founded on. It is no one's job to make the judgments they believe God is responsible for but many think it is. I feel if more religious people that are so concerned with everyone else would put those efforts into their own home then the country would be better off. I know I have a hard enough time taking care of me and my fiance and want no part in someone else's life choices.

That is not constrained to Christianity or religion.
 
#64
#64
Our schools should not be teaching 6th graders to experiment sexually. And evolution being taught as fact is wrong in and of itself. Unless it can be proven as fact it cannot be fact. It can be taught as a theory, but even then you need to arm the kids with the other side of the debate or not teach it at all. What is wrong with my argument here pj?

I'm not one to stomp on people's beliefs and I hope you don't see this that way. There is much more evidence to suggest evolution that the "7 day" belief. I also believe that things like the "young earth" way of thinking should never be presented in any form in an accredited classroom (but some want it).

And teaching experimentation in 6th graders? I think many confuse education with telling them how to do it. I mean, who here didn't get more education thru middle school locker room talk than their parents? We are sexual beings and teaching kids that are of that age the facts of life is not dangerous, it's healthy. My mother is a 6th grade teacher and trust me they already know plenty.
 
#65
#65
I don't agree with every law but I vehemently disagree with laws passed because the bible said so. Where they come from is exactly the issue in question.
actually, the laws are passed because the legislature said so, but much of the lobbying behind the efforts, in the cases to which you're referring, was driven by the because the Bible said so mindset.
 
#66
#66
What does it matter to you if he does or doesn't and how does that effect you. So turn the question around, do you believe he made it happen? If not then why? What evidence do you have that it did not? I can state simply that I have no evidence to support that it did but believe it anyway. And by the way the Bible stated there were these two cities that were since lost to history. It seems to me that the Bible was right about the cities existence so why shouldn't I believe the rest of the story?

You are making implications into my post I didn't intend. I was only trying to distinguish his faith.

There is no way to prove whether or not GOD made the disasters happen.
 
#67
#67
,,, but Christianity seems to get more blame than liberalism. I would say I'm not sure why, but I have a good idea.


You are comparing apples and oranges. Christianity is a belief system, yes, but it is based on the deeply personal decision of faith. "Liberalism" is somewhat a belief system, I would agree, but it is not nearly as deep or sensitive in nature as a religion. At least not for most people.

When a liberal tries to persuade you that you are wrong on policy choices, that's one thing. It can get heated and personal. But telling someone their belief in the nature of their existence, their faith in God, the origin and fate of humanity, etc., is wrong, well, that's an entirely different level of disagreement.
 
#68
#68
I'm not one to stomp on people's beliefs and I hope you don't see this that way. There is much more evidence to suggest evolution that the "7 day" belief. I also believe that things like the "young earth" way of thinking should never be presented in any form in an accredited classroom (but some want it).

And teaching experimentation in 6th graders? I think many confuse education with telling them how to do it. I mean, who here didn't get more education thru middle school locker room talk than their parents? We are sexual beings and teaching kids that are of that age the facts of life is not dangerous, it's healthy. My mother is a 6th grade teacher and trust me they already know plenty.


I have a 7 year old daughter, and you would be surprised about what 7 year old kids talkabout (not mine thank goodness). It is about the government's role, and their role is not to replace the parent. I know that parents don't always do what they should, but that doesn't mean the school, givt etc should take over. I'm sorry, but that's a little too much "for the greater good".
 
#69
#69
It does pose an interesting question about where does popular opinion apply in law.
we are a republic by design to specifically avoid mob rule, but it's not a perfect solution.

We would like for our legislators to use their discretion, but they are supposed to best represent the will of the people. I don't know that anyone elected could fit that bill and unfortunately, most of them are about the will of themselves and preservation of their positions.
 
#70
#70
That is not constrained to Christianity or religion.

I could never disagree with that. It's the whole squeaky wheel thing

How are my views forcing religion down anyone's throat? If anything, aren't beliefs such as yours being forced down mine? I'm just saying I don't want to force my religionon anyone, but at the same time laws come from morality.

I force no beliefs down anyone's throat and I do believe that moral laws are fine as long as they are confined within the actual document that formed this nation. I just don't believe that anyone using the Bible as their justification has anyone's best interest in mind but their own. All I'm saying is I do not want to be forced to live my life by religious laws. Prove that it doesn't infringe on the rights of another and I am fine with it. May not like it but...
 
#71
#71
actually, the laws are passed because the legislature said so, but much of the lobbying behind the efforts, in the cases to which you're referring, was driven by the because the Bible said so mindset.

Anyone behind any idea is driven by some sort of mindset. That does not make the idea in and of itself, not credible. To be against an idea solely because you don't like the source of the idea, in most cases, would be unreasonable.
 
#72
#72
You are comparing apples and oranges. Christianity is a belief system, yes, but it is based on the deeply personal decision of faith. "Liberalism" is somewhat a belief system, I would agree, but it is not nearly as deep or sensitive in nature as a religion. At least not for most people.

When a liberal tries to persuade you that you are wrong on policy choices, that's one thing. It can get heated and personal. But telling someone their belief in the nature of their existence, their faith in God, the origin and fate of humanity, etc., is wrong, well, that's an entirely different level of disagreement.

Wrong, liberalism is becoming a religion in and of itself... they focus as hard to take God out of everything as a Christian does to prove there is a God. It's not just policy choices, it's belief, values, science etc. that they try to "force".
 
#73
#73
I'm not one to stomp on people's beliefs and I hope you don't see this that way. There is much more evidence to suggest evolution that the "7 day" belief. I also believe that things like the "young earth" way of thinking should never be presented in any form in an accredited classroom (but some want it).

And teaching experimentation in 6th graders? I think many confuse education with telling them how to do it. I mean, who here didn't get more education thru middle school locker room talk than their parents? We are sexual beings and teaching kids that are of that age the facts of life is not dangerous, it's healthy. My mother is a 6th grade teacher and trust me they already know plenty.

There are many ways to interpret the creation story for example days can also mean periods of time in the original text. If parents want the schools to teach their kids about sex fine. Some parents however would like to take this responsibility on themselves. Either that or have someone they trust talk to their kids about it and put it in some kind of context for the kids. Parents rights are being eroded. A child can go to the school clinic and in some states receive an abortion without parent notification, but these same schools will not dispense tylenol to these same kids. One is a medical procedure with risks and the other is an over the counter medicine available at a gas station. Does that make sense?
 
#74
#74
Wrong, liberalism is becoming a religion in and of itself... they focus as hard to take God out of everything as a Christian does to prove there is a God. It's not just policy choices, it's belief, values, science etc. that they try to "force".


We have reached an impasse on this particular aspect of the debate. We won't agree on this one thing.
 
#75
#75
Anyone behind any idea is driven by some sort of mindset. That does not make the idea in and of itself, not credible. To be against an idea solely because you don't like the source of the idea, in most cases, would be unreasonable.
I didn't say the source isn't credible. I said no law has been passed because the Bible said so. I said the legislators have been influenced by those touting the "because the Bible said so" as the reason for their viewpoint.

I'm OK with the laws being passed for that reason, so long as it is in line with the majority view of the country (in most cases).
 

VN Store



Back
Top