volinbham
VN GURU
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2004
- Messages
- 69,686
- Likes
- 62,054
He's always had pretty solid support in the Midwest. Could help in Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania. Ohio and Indiana aren't flipping blue for anybody, so that's moot.hmmm - doesn't bring any swing states or likely undecideds - would be an out of the box choice
He's always had pretty solid support in the Midwest. Could help in Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania. Ohio and Indiana aren't flipping blue for anybody, so that's moot.
He's never had solid support in the South, so that might hurt in Georgia and North Carolina.
Decisions, decisions.
There's a certain fella from South Bend, Indiana, that has been making the media rounds yesterday and today (he was just on CNN with Erin Collins).
And he ain't saying no when asked about VP...
Why do you even post here?? You seem to be a voice of some reason here. I’ve been lurking, he, he…just because of the last week.Assuming there is only one "bite" event from the campaign 4 years ago, the context you provided lessens the moment of concern about mental acuity.
I haven't seen the video in years. I think I posted a still frame or link to the video a few weeks ago, though.
dang the gigs up back to the coding facility... come get me mother i'm thruWhy do you even post here?? You seem to be a voice of some reason here. I’ve been lurking, he, he…just because of the last week.
But seriously, you’re better than this cesspool. Really? These guys aren’t going to change ethers mind. It’s endless, you’re the bad voter versus NO!, you’re the bad voter. You’re better than this……..unless………………………………….you like to actually get their minds and actually think . Oh okay. My pie hole is shut. Sh!t stirring has been commenced.
Have to see what the messaging is from the Harris campaign. Whoever the VP is will tout her policy plans, not necessarily their own. Though I don't imagine there will be a big shift from the last 4 years regarding EV policy in the Harris campaign.Can't imagine the e-vehicle dogma is a big winner in Michigan
Have to see what the messaging is from the Harris campaign. Whoever the VP is will tout her policy plans, not necessarily their own. Though I don't imagine there will be a big shift from the last 4 years regarding EV policy in the Harris campaign.
A thing about Pete though is people might disagree with his politics, but they rarely despise him personally. He's got the polite nerd vibe lol. That can help when there are some policy disagreements.
(Well, I mean except for the few hate-filled bigots that despise him because he is gay, but they hate everything, especially themselves, and are never voting for a Democratic administration anyways.)
Been a minute since I’ve posted about anything. These times are crazy.Have to see what the messaging is from the Harris campaign. Whoever the VP is will tout her policy plans, not necessarily their own. Though I don't imagine there will be a big shift from the last 4 years regarding EV policy in the Harris campaign.
A thing about Pete though is people might disagree with his politics, but they rarely despise him personally. He's got the polite nerd vibe lol. That can help when there are some policy disagreements.
(Well, I mean except for the few hate-filled bigots that despise him because he is gay, but they hate everything, especially themselves, and are never voting for a Democratic administration anyways.)
I think you misconstrued my post. I did say there are few, I didn't make a blanket statement about everyone on the right.Been a minute since I’ve posted about anything. These times are crazy.
But this post is absolutely right on….until the parenthetical. My belief is that most right of center folks around the US don’t actually GAS about race gender or sexual orientation. My experience is that people mostly care about policy viewpoints. Which you admit there might be disagreements.
Then the left literally takes a parenthetical left turn. It becomes an ad hominem about racism, sexism or whatever to say it’s not policy, it the person. Which is where you’re wrong. 2024 America doesn’t care about those things except for the imagination of the left. Which actually makes the problem worse. I’m a proud supporter of gay rights. But I would never vote for Pete because I don’t believe his policy priorities align with those of our United States.
But the lefts continual labeling of people being an “ist” is actually making our world a worse place. Stop it.
ok just one question Randle McMurphy.... if yer "pi hole" is shut ... how do i hear?Didn’t you hear? My pie hole is shut. Or we can do it your way. Just say the word
View attachment 661336
Or just again, I’ll lose interest.
I would be interested in knowing how the “gay” issue moves the needle for a candidate. The percentage of folks who are gay seems to vary wildly depending upon who’s doing the article. I would assume anyone who is gay would likely support a gay candidate regardless of qualifications or policy much like the black vote appears to overwhelmingly vote for a black candidate. Obviously, there will also be a percentage of voters who would eliminate a gay candidate for consideration on the gay issue alone. Which group is larger?Have to see what the messaging is from the Harris campaign. Whoever the VP is will tout her policy plans, not necessarily their own. Though I don't imagine there will be a big shift from the last 4 years regarding EV policy in the Harris campaign.
A thing about Pete though is people might disagree with his politics, but they rarely despise him personally. He's got the polite nerd vibe lol. That can help when there are some policy disagreements.
(Well, I mean except for the few hate-filled bigots that despise him because he is gay, but they hate everything, especially themselves, and are never voting for a Democratic administration anyways.)
Doesn’t sound loony at all turbo.Trump, perpetually lies. And he disavowed it to duck the fact he endorses it. Moreover, most of Trumpon's high level allies have major roles in Project 2025. Trump is Beelzebub, a liar and the father if lies.