Biden stops sex offender program

#26
#26
Your figures are off. They're not spending $300T on this. Come back with an accurate number and we can have a talk.

You've got to be trolling, right?

This is basically a mirror image of the conversation about principle that Milton Friedman had with young Michael Moore. You should check it out.
 
#27
#27
Prove that it is. Add something of substance to the conversation

I think the point (at least my point) is that we actually don't know what the operation entailed other than what the news articles are reporting it as, which is as a very basic summary. It's entirely possible it's a redundant operation that would waste money and resources on an issue they are already working on. But it's also entirely possible they are ending a much needed operation without much care for who it affects.

It's absolutely okay to question why they would shut it down (and we SHOULD question it). It's not okay to make baseless assumptions with no other information provided.
 
#31
#31
Stopped reading here because of the intense laughter.

I get it. You like reading trash journalism "news" sites and like watching NEWSMAX for your latest QAnon conspiracy. Let me know how that works out for you.
 
#32
#32
The point of you and others saying "now hold on, we need more info that this is happening."

18 States think the program was worth it. That's a pretty good confirmation.

A bunch also thought the election was "stolen" as well. Pretty clear that AGs of both parties stand directly on their party lines.
 
#33
#33
The point of you and others saying "now hold on, we need more info that this is happening."

18 States think the program was worth it. That's a pretty good confirmation.

Then I did get the point. My point was that it's not a good confirmation. So that means you didn't get my point...
 
#34
#34
A bunch also thought the election was "stolen" as well. Pretty clear that AGs of both parties stand directly on their party lines.
You're exactly right here. One party is pro-trafficking, pro-child sexual abuse, and one is not. Excellent clarification.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dovervolz
#35
#35
I love how the folks telling people that the liberal media lies and you can't trust anything they report, but these same people are 100% on board with trusting rando news sites or 18 Republican AGs that they've never met....
 
Last edited:
#36
#36
You're exactly right here. One party is pro-trafficking, pro-child sexual abuse, and one is not. Excellent clarification.

LOL, is that what QAnon was telling you today?

I also find it hilarious your golden boy has been accused of the same things you so vehemently accuse all Dems of supporting (not to mention his known ties to Epstein), and he's given a free pass because he says things you like and has an R next to his name.
 
#37
#37
I get it. You like reading trash journalism "news" sites and like watching NEWSMAX for your latest QAnon conspiracy. Let me know how that works out for you.

Lol

Is this the new go-to for liberals? Accuse everyone of being a Q follower and reading Newsmax? Because that's going to get old quickly.

There are more than enough articles out there stating the obvious without having to rely on an extremely partisan rag like the WaPo. It's hypocritical to call someone out for using a partisan rag then turn around and use a partisan rag as your "evidence."
 
#38
#38
And to be clear, I voted Republican in every election up until 2016, and still vote Republican on the vast majority of issues. But I also am a big believer in getting all the facts.

There a lot of things to be critical of Biden on, just like there was with Trump.
 
#39
#39
I love how the folks telling people that the liberal media lies and you can't trust anything they report, but these same people are 100% on board with trusting rando news sites or 18 Republican AGs that they've never met....

Shouldn't sex crimes be a bipartisan issue?
 
#40
#40
Lol

Is this the new go-to for liberals? Accuse everyone of being a Q follower and reading Newsmax? Because that's going to get old quickly.

There are more than enough articles out there stating the obvious without having to rely on an extremely partisan rag like the WaPo. It's hypocritical to call someone out for using a partisan rag then turn around and use a partisan rag as your "evidence."

I linked the article because it had direct quotes from ICE representatives that gave way more insight than the trash article that was posted that said "Dems hate you ."

The WaPo article literally presented opinions from both sides. But sure, keep believing the WaPo article that consisted of actual quotes from ICE representatives and presented the arguments of both sides is somehow less unbiased than a news site that literally said "They hate you."
 
#43
#43
LOL, is that what QAnon was telling you today?

I also find it hilarious your golden boy has been accused of the same things you so vehemently accuse all Dems of supporting (not to mention his known ties to Epstein), and he's given a free pass because he says things you like and has an R next to his name.
I have no connection and have done zero research into Q-anon.

I have seen plenty of images of Joe Biden treating children inappropriately, and have watched him fondly recollect abuse of black kids.

I have also watched left-leaning politicians begin parading about acceptance of "minor attracted persons", and seen accompanying Twitter posts and articles from leftist publications.

None of this is conspiracy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dovervolz
#44
#44
And to be clear, I voted Republican in every election up until 2016, and still vote Republican on the vast majority of issues. But I also am a big believer in getting all the facts.

There a lot of things to be critical of Biden on, just like there was with Trump.

That is great. You get a trophy!

 
  • Like
Reactions: dovervolz
#45
#45
I linked the article because it had direct quotes from ICE representatives that gave way more insight than the trash article that was posted that said "Dems hate you ."

The WaPo article literally presented opinions from both sides. But sure, keep believing the WaPo article that consisted of actual quotes from ICE representatives and presented the arguments of both sides is somehow less unbiased than a news site that literally said "They hate you."

You lost all credibility when you had to fall back on the stupidity of your Q statements. That tells me one thing...

You don't have an argument.

Now, 18 State Attorney Generals are asking to keep that particular program in place. Just that one. Not suing, not screaming, merely requesting that one single program be continued. That, to me means a lot more than any WaPo article trying to do every mental gymnastics know to man to support Biden. Which the are already guilty of.
 
#46
#46
I have no connection and have done zero research into Q-anon.

I have seen plenty of images of Joe Biden treating children inappropriately, and have watched him fondly recollect abuse of black kids.

I have also watched left-leaning politicians begin parading about acceptance of "minor attracted persons", and seen accompanying Twitter posts and articles from leftist publications.

None of this is conspiracy.

Most of those are fake or his family. If you had bothered to look those up instead of believing everything you read/see, you would know that.
 
Last edited:
#47
#47
You lost all credibility when you had to fall back on the stupidity of your Q statements. That tells me one thing...

You don't have an argument.

Now, 18 State Attorney Generals are asking to keep that particular program in place. Just that one. Not suing, not screaming, merely requesting that one single program be continued. That, to me means a lot more than any WaPo article trying to do every mental gymnastics know to man to support Biden. Which the are already guilty of.

I don't have an argument.... says the man who clearly didn't even read the Wapo article and is basing his entire argument from an article in which the author literally said Dems hate you.

Have fun in your fantasy land.
 
#48
#48
I don't have an argument.... says the man who clearly didn't even read the Wapo article and is basing his entire argument from an article in which the author literally said Dems hate you.

Have fun in your fantasy land.

I did read the article. And your "source" had zero knowledge of the operation and "believed" they shelved it.

Again, 18 AG's are asking for it to go forward. That's a well reported fact from multiple news agencies not speaking on the conditions of anonymity.

You continually fall into the trap of "unnamed" (and read that as unverified) sources that agencies aren't even trying to vet these days. But, obviously Q told me that.
 
#49
#49
I did read the article. And your "source" had zero knowledge of the operation and "believed" they shelved it.

Again, 18 AG's are asking for it to go forward. That's a well reported fact from multiple news agencies not speaking on the conditions of anonymity.

You continually fall into the trap of "unnamed" (and read that as unverified) sources that agencies aren't even trying to vet these days. But, obviously Q told me that.

ICE also has the ability to comment if something reported were untrue.

I don't really care that 18 Republican AGs are asking for it. These same people also backed the moronic notion that the election was stolen. So you'll forgive me if I don't hold their opinions in high esteem.

Again, from my first response I even said ending this seems ill advised. But we don't have any other information about it other than the operation was nixed. Why aren't these same news agencies that you do support digging more in this to reveal this information? Surely the WaPo isn't the only news agency ICE is willing to speak with.
 
#50
#50
And to be clear, I voted Republican in every election up until 2016, and still vote Republican on the vast majority of issues. But I also am a big believer in getting all the facts.

There a lot of things to be critical of Biden on, just like there was with Trump.


Wait....so you voted for both Bush's, McCain, Romney but not Trump?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77

VN Store



Back
Top