Billy Antrim
aka The Kid
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2009
- Messages
- 4,773
- Likes
- 6,032
Oh and another thing to add... you say Russell putting up better numbers makes him better?
Can you even name a single player that was on the Chargers offense besides Leaf? I'm pretty sure the Raiders gave Russell a 50 million dollar wide receiver and a 60 million dollar tackle.
Russell was a drug addict.
Russell didn't work out and ate a crap load of food.
Russell was given more money.
Russell was surrounded with more talent.
I will judge plenty of other things. I've never seen anyone do so little for 39 million aside from winning the lottery or having a rich family member die.
lol: Worst attempt at an analogy ever...
Wow... you're basically a jerk.
You have no answer and cry that I don't agree with you. I mean, you're the one saying Russell is better because he had better numbers. That's the logic you chose to use. In your opinion Testeverde must be better than Montana because of the numbers.
I get it. Russell is your homeboy. Good for you.
Who's crying?
I've already said that I don't give a damn about all the random stupid judgments you make. The only issues that really matter here are performance on the field and in the locker room. Period. Russell was better at both. I don't really care whether you agree with me; I'm right. Not my fault you used a ridiculous comparison.
Who's crying?
I've already said that I don't give a damn about all the random stupid judgments you make. The only issues that really matter here are performance on the field and in the locker room. Period. Russell was better at both. I don't really care whether you agree with me; I'm right. Not my fault you used a ridiculous comparison.
You're seriously a dick. Anyone can say I'm right, you're wrong.
You don't even take into consideration the talent they had around them. You couldn't name a single player from the Chargers offense.
Anyways... have fun being a bandwagon and cheering for two schools you could never get into.
No, he didn't.
Ryan Leaf won four games. Ever.
Clearly anyone can, because you're saying it when you're completely wrong.
I know about Natrone Means, Freddie Jones, etc. I just try not to waste too much of my time debating absurd statements like how they were worse than the recent Raider teams.
Oh look, you're wrong again. What a surprise!
Clearly anyone can, because you're saying it when you're completely wrong.
I know about Natrone Means, Freddie Jones, etc. I just try not to waste too much of my time debating absurd, clearly uninformed statements. Saying the Chargers were worse than the recent Raider teams qualifies.
Oh look, you're wrong again. What a surprise!
So now you bring up wins... hilarious. Back track much?
Let's see...
Testeverde's 46,233 yards to Montana's 40,551 yards.
Testeverde's 275 touchdowns thrown to Montana's 273.
Did you or did you not say Russell is better than Leaf because he had better numbers on the field?
I am done with this. You're full of yourself and fail at logic in every sense.
I'd have to go with Leaf because anybody who'd watched Russell play in college knew he was too boneheaded to be a successful pro QB. You could count on him making two stupid plays a game to keep the other team in it. I don't see how anyone can be the biggest bust ever when it was obvious beforehand that he'd be a failure. Al Davis deserves as much blame as Russell.
In contrast, there was close to 100 percent consensus that Leaf would be a good pro QB. A lot of of the media at the time scoffed at the Colts for taking Manning instead.
I think Leaf had the single greatest line for any QB ever: 1-15, 4 yards, 2 INT, 3 fumbles. Even Russell never managed anything like that, did he?