Biggesst Indicator that Dooley is a horrible coach

#28
#28
At the end of the day, La Tech is 7 - 1 without Dooley and ranked in the top 25
 
#29
#29
vol-un-tear said:
Tech would lose to SC, GA, Fla and Bama. I would gladly replace them with 4 of Techs opponents. I agree our defense is awful. We would outscore others- like Troy- and win.
Click to expand...

I would prefer to have a defense that swarms to the football and can wrap up and tackle players.Not pu$$y arm tackling either.A defense that force turnovers and play all out foor 60 min.
 
#30
#30
Spawn said:
Read the tag a couple more times, then answer. The tag "Biggest indicator that Dooley is a horrible coach"

Proves what I said in the tag. Said nothing about recruiting, showering, or people who post without reading.
Click to expand...

RECRUITING is part of being a COACH
 
#32
#32
Biggest Indicator Dooley is a Horrible Coach

There are many, but let's start with: losing to Kentucky, who had a WR playing QB for the first time since HS, after 23 straight wins, losing his defensive coordinator in the off season to the PAC 10, looking to Saban's staff for the replacement, hiring a position coach to be DC instead of a proven DC, allowing Curley Sunseri to switch to the 3-4 scheme, which has ensured a losing season again, and I sure hope, has ensured our athletic director, unless he really IS a bammer mole, will FIRE Dooley ASAP and hire the best coach money can buy. Bammer suffered 20-something years after the bear until they finally understood what to do. We should be about 20 years smarter than Bammer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#33
#33
Don't care what LA Tech does. We hit rock bottom against KY last season and still continue to scrape the bottom. Offensively we look good against lesser opponents, but that is about it.
 
#34
#34
This has to be the worst I've ever seen our defense look. We need to straighten this mess out and bring in a solid high profile HC with a dream team staff asap so 2014 recruiting can be a top class for us. There is unbelievable talent in that class, including several legacies, that will come to UT if we hire the right HC NOW!

I cannot imagine that these guys would even consider committing to UT under this staff. Especially considering the current public perception of this staff as hanging on by a string, on the hot seat and likely out before long.
 
#37
#37
calban said:
The biggest indicator is that he doesn't seem to know what he's doing.
3 years still no kicking game.
3 years to get a hint of a running game.
Talks about slowing the game down to keep the ball away from his defense. doesn't do it.
Scrapping his entire defense (switch to 3-4). really stupid.
Should have chosen interim on staff to change gradually.
We could go on.
The guy is out of his depth and should know it by now.
Click to expand...

We are tied for 4th in yds/carry in a league that is prdominately run oriented. That is against the better defenses in the SEC. We average 162 yds/gm again against some of the toughest defenses in the country. Our team has plenty of deficiences that will support your agenda. Our running game shouldnt be on that list. Hate on.
 
#38
#38
You guys are wrongly blaming DD for our Terrible D. Hart hired Sal, DD wanted Strong. You guys need to start bashing dumbass Hart. Everyone keeps wondering why Hart is not doing anything. Well if he fired Sal it would make him look like the dumbass. Its much easier to drag the whole team down and make DD look like a dumbass. Hart if you out there reading this post. KISS MY ASS YOU IDIOT:the_finger::the_finger:
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top