RespectTradition
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2010
- Messages
- 1,831
- Likes
- 7
can't see how that's really possible if executed correctly. A pee test is pretty cheap
because that would make too much sense. Most state employees don't view their check as coming from tax payers
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/18/us/no-savings-found-in-florida-welfare-drug-tests.html?_r=2&hp
From July through October in Florida the four months when testing took place before Judge Scrivens order 2.6 percent of the states cash assistance applicants failed the drug test, or 108 of 4,086, according to the figures from the state obtained by the group. The most common reason was marijuana use. An additional 40 people canceled the tests without taking them.
Because the Florida law requires that applicants who pass the test be reimbursed for the cost, an average of $30, the cost to the state was $118,140. This is more than would have been paid out in benefits to the people who failed the test, Mr. Newton said.
As a result, the testing cost the government an extra $45,780, he said.
And the testing did not have the effect some predicted. An internal document about Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, or TANF, caseloads stated that the drug testing policy, at least from July through September, did not lead to fewer cases.
We saw no dampening effect on the caseload, the document said.
I am torn over this. I do not like the idea of paying someone to be on drugs on principle. However, I hate the idea of paying more to stop it. The idea of cutting off my nose to spite my face comes to mind.