Escape Goat
All VOL !!!
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2009
- Messages
- 38,064
- Likes
- 1,906
Exactly. Don't like Gregg Doyle of CBS much, but he's spot on in his analysis.
Petrino firing offense? Not adultery or lie, but putting Arkansas at risk - NCAA Football, NFLDRAFT - CBSSports.com News, Scores, Stats, Schedule and BCS Rankings
If someone applied for her position, male or female, the school could face civil lawsuits, EEOC compliance issues.
Most state and city governments forbid supervisor/ subordinate relationships. It causes all kinds of problems
Unless someone can absolutely prove otherwise, I bet legal position is going to be there was no improper relationship prior to her being hired( as ridiculous as that comes across). If they can pull that one off then it wiill be up to the university to determine if he has brought enough negative pub on the school to warrant firing. If they think they can get away with it they will.
If you can't prove otherwise they certainly can, no matter how unlikely it is. :crazy:
They can contend that was the first "date"
I'm not saying they couldn't make that argument if they are dumb enough to try. What I'm saying is that no one would buy it, and the negative press would be so bad that the school would become a poster child for sexual harassment, nepotism, and excused adultery. An institution of higher learning cannot invite that kind of publicity on itself.
Quid pro quo harassment involves an explicit or implied exchange; that is, the granting ordenial of a benefit or privilege in exchange for sexual considerations. The harasser uses submission to or rejection of the offensive conduct as the basis for decisions such as employment, promotion, transfer, selection for training, performance evaluation, or the basis for academic evaluation or recommendations.
Consensual sexual relationships between faculty and their students or between supervisors and their employees in some instances may result in charges of sexual harassment.
Consensual relationships may lead other faculty and students or supervisors and coworkers to question the validity of grades, evaluations, and other interactions between the people involved in such a relationship. The integrity of the work of both people in the relationship may be compromised.
It can be consensual and be sexual harassment.
I know it makes no sense, but a 3rd party can claim that they were treated differently than her, because of her relationship with Petrino.
Whether they do or not, the lawyers may try to avoid that angle. In that case, I would say she is more likely to get the boot than Petrino
So apparently Bobby had a passenger on his motorcycle when he had his little accident. Wasn't reported at first but Arkansas Highway Patrol released the info. Apparently she isn't his wife either Uh-oh (Carl Lewis voice)
She also just so happens to be a hot former volleyball player
![]()
Ole Bobby may have explaining to do!
If someone applied for her position, male or female, the school could face civil lawsuits, EEOC compliance issues.
Most state and city governments forbid supervisor/ subordinate relationships. It causes all kinds of problems
Seems it's a new position that was created. So it should have to be "posted" for people to apply right? Does it work like that in Arkansas?