Doesnt matter one bit to me. But from this angle, the two players closest from this camera view were off sides and the ref was right there. Unless their feet are what needs to cross the line,they were over the line with head, shoulders and almost a knee before the kicker kicked the ball. Hate it for the players, but it was what it was. Review would have come back as confirmed with not enough evidence to overturn the call probably.
amazing.- Was it a bad call? Certainly...gotta wonder, was it an SEC crew, by chance?
- Was calling a timeout at the juncture that Lyle called it also a bad call? Yup. But the chart wants what the chart wants, apparently.
- Years after that steaming pile was scraped off the bottom of the program's shoe, is the schadenfreude of seeing that goofy charlatan fall on his face and lose his sh*t still heartwarming? Hell yes it is.
They sure looked early on the revese angle replay. If you slow it down, their bodies are clearly across the line when the ball is kicked. I'm still not clear, though, on whether they are looking at the feet or the body. If it's the feet, then it's really, really close. This same thing happened to us at the end of a game a few years ago - recovering an onside kick but got called offsides and it was less obvious than this one.After watching the video I think the players were offsides.
Doesnt matter one bit to me. But from this angle, the two players closest from this camera view were off sides and the ref was right there. Unless their feet are what needs to cross the line,they were over the line with head, shoulders and almost a knee before the kicker kicked the ball. Hate it for the players, but it was what it was. Review would have come back as confirmed with not enough evidence to overturn the call probably.