Sad to say, but this isn’t a first. Conference tournaments are weak to irrelevant data to them. The logistics involved in the tournament are massive. They can’t work it out on the weekend. The heaviest influencing bodies are the conferences. They weigh in on preferences based on outcomes midweek. I wasn’t being contrary when I said they’d seed Duke and KY over their achievements. It’s just what the conferences were going to push. A&M being left out is a great example of the boundaries of conference sway. The only “contingencies” are the ones that are forced by auto bids. After our game, Buzz was being interviewed by a regional reporter behind the announcer table. He said we’re going to play more basketball in “a” tournament. He knew the deal. They were going to get screwed. In the end, I think I probably prefer a 3 in Indy over a 2 in the West. Imagine if we get to New Orleans. Few things ring truer to an SEC fan than playing for a championship there. The committee makes their guidelines as a way to justify what they do. They don’t use those guidelines to define what they do. That sucks, but it’s not new. The new changes they made to the guidelines just shine a brighter light on the politics involved. All that said, I would assume Sankey talked to White, who talked to Barnes. They knew the deal before Sunday was ever played.