omghulkhands
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2010
- Messages
- 12,104
- Likes
- 14,392
If Butler would've lost in one of first two tourney games, which could have easily been losses? Some were saying Butler may not have got in at all without winning conf tourney.
Thoughts?
If Butler would've lost in one of first two tourney games, which could have easily been losses? Some were saying Butler may not have got in at all without winning conf tourney.
Thoughts?
My first choice out of the names brought up so far is L Frank, hands down. He may not know the NCAA rule book inside-out but he can dang sure hire some stud assistants who do. I would think kids would also be jumping at the opportunity to play for a coach with that much NBA experience. JMO.
I agree with Verc though that
1. Derek Dooley who was brought in at the worst possible time and who was not the first choice should have nothing to do with the salary we offer our top bball prospective coach
2. We should structure the contract so that we are looking for a Brad Stevens to stay here for the rest of his career.
3. We should be willing to pay more than 3 million per year.
That's not the point, and it is why you see a lot of people cringe when guys like Shaka Smart are mentioned solely on the strength of one tourney run.
Basketball is a funny game. You have one off shooting night, or get one opponent who is on fire, or one flaky official, and a strong team goes down to a weak team. Damned near every great coach--Self, Pitino, Williams, Izzo, K--has had an early round flame out with a superior team. It happens.
The point is to put a team together that is capable of making a deep tourney run and then have them playing well in March. All the names I listed have proven they can do that repeatedly. And once you take the legendary unavailable coaches off the list, Stevens is the closest thing to a guy who has proven he can do the same thing.
If UT can get Brad Stevens Ill be on board all the way to the championship???????. Butler just beat Fla because of the coaching of Brad Stevens. I just don't think he will come to UT. If he does :good!:man
I agree with Verc though that
1. Derek Dooley who was brought in at the worst possible time and who was not the first choice should have nothing to do with the salary we offer our top bball prospective coach
2. We should structure the contract so that we are looking for a Brad Stevens to stay here for the rest of his career.
3. We should be willing to pay more than 3 million per year.
3 will never happen.
Stevens has pretty well punched his ticket to anywhere he wants to go. If Roy Williams retires, he'll be at UNC, if it's Calhoun, UConn will be calling him.. he can go anywhere he wants. He is definetly the top of my list, but no one is seeming to take it seriously. I'd at least wait til' the tournament is over and give him a call, it doesn't have to come out, just a call.
Hard to know exactly how much of Butler's recent success is Stevens and how much might be something else. The past 2 years have been extraordinary, but it's often a mistake to assume the extraordinary will be the norm. As a statistician would say "correlation does not guarantee causality". Could be that Butler's success is because Stevens is a phenomenal coach, but it might just as easily be because he's lucked into a phenomenal group of players who just really, really click as a team. You can't count on players always developing physically as Hayward did, you can't always count on mid level prospects developing beyond their apparent potential no matter how well they're coached, and Howard is a once in a blue moon recruit for Butler. For every Lofton, there's 20 Tabb's. I wouldn't turn Stevens down, but I think the jury might still be out.