volinbham
VN GURU
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2004
- Messages
- 69,802
- Likes
- 62,555
Are you a bigot if you vote against a conservative belief system? A liberal one? A moderate one?
When you cast a ballot, you cast it for something, against something, or a combination of the 2.
Wow. What a steaming pile. Let me translate:
I am smart, they (target group) are dumb. I am superior to that generalized group. I am not bigoted because I'm unbiased and use science/reason to counter their uneducated, crazy, dangerous views.
Pick an individual who expresses views and attack them. Generalize to a whole group which you repeatedly do and you are moving into bigotry. Above you make a claim about the religious right - you have no idea what the views held by any individuals within that group are but you condemn the whole group for views inconsistent with yours.
Operative word is "more". I don't understand how Protestants think Mormons, Buddhists, or anybody else has "weird" or outlandish beliefs. They don't see how "weird" their own beliefs are to outsiders.
Everyone has irrational or at least poorly founded prejudices. I'm not above typical human frailty in that regard.
But dismissing criticism of the religious right's storied hypocrisy when it comes to religious tolerance as me just being smugly intellectual is comical.
I'm not saying you are being smugly intellectual. I'm saying you have a pattern of labeling entire groups as being prejuidiced and hence implying members of the groups are bigoted. The point you miss is that such statements themselves are bigoted.
It gets even worse when you defend it by saying your side is the "smart, rational" side. That is classic bigotry (believing your group to be generally superior to another).
And so , yes, you are damn right when I perceive the GOP Evangelical right, who we all know has a huge voice in these earlier primaries, criticizing, rejecting, mocking, etc., a major candidate for office based on religious views. I will, 100 % of the time, call them out for their backasswards thinking, their hillbilly bullshiite demagoguery, etc.
I don't know what the numbers were, but I imagine there were Democrats who didn't like Kennedy because he was Catholic.
No, I mean, you should investigate the other side's argument or position at least a little bit. That of course depends on the issue. For example,I don't have to spend a ton of time comparing Mitt Romney's immigration position relative to Gingrich's to know whose I think is more palatable and sensible. I do, on the other hand, have to do some reading and listening before deciding whether I think the payroll tax cut bill should or should not include the pipeline proposal.
I DO mock Christians who take it upon themselves to judge others' belief systems based solely on their own religious dogma, yes.
Now, it just so happens that such practice is going to be more prevalent in the Democratic or liberal tradition because they rely for their own belief systems more on science and reason, rather than faith.
That does not mean anyone is saying there is anything wrong with faith. Well, actually, I would admit that for some people it does if they have absolutely no faith of their own.
But, it is in my view a major tenet of Christianity not to be bigoted against others' religious views. It is also, in my view, a major tenet of pluralistic representative government thinking and philosophy that one does not exclude from government service or running for office someone based on their religious point of view.
And so , yes, you are damn right when I perceive the GOP Evangelical right, who we all know has a huge voice in these earlier primaries, criticizing, rejecting, mocking, etc., a major candidate for office based on religious views. I will, 100 % of the time, call them out for their backasswards thinking, their hillbilly bullshiite demagoguery, etc.
Why? Simple., Because I am smart and they are ignorant jackarses. They SHOULD be called out for their inane prejudices. Indeed, my point a few above was that it ought to be right thinking folks like yourselves who should be leading the charge to oust from your intellectual ranks the mouth breathers who think Romney is in a cult.
If you won't do it, then I will mock you, too, as having no courage to stand up for what is right under the Constitution of the US of A.
I like how you cut out the beginning part of my comment where I expressly agreed with that very distinction.
Well done.
Actor Gary Busey is withdrawing his endorsement of Newt Gingrich for president.
It is not time for me to be endorsing anyone at this time! When there are the two final candidates, then I will endorse, Busey said Wednesday in a statement released through his representative.
Wow. What a steaming pile. Let me translate:
I am smart, they (target group) are dumb. I am superior to that generalized group. I am not bigoted because I'm unbiased and use science/reason to counter their uneducated, crazy, dangerous views.
Pick an individual who expresses views and attack them. Generalize to a whole group which you repeatedly do and you are moving into bigotry. Above you make a claim about the religious right - you have no idea what the views held by any individuals within that group are but you condemn the whole group for views inconsistent with yours.
Because you aren't a religious person? Can you see how a religious person would think it's weird you have such low regard for religion?
When I was religious, I felt like all religions were weird, and it didn't bother me for outsiders to say so. People tend to be a little more sensitive than I am, so maybe I should be more careful about calling it "weird".
Why?
People believe what they want, that is fine. Bama fans may think I am weird for liking the Vols. So what. Does it matter, or should it be different because it is religion, and why?
Because I care about whether or not I hurt other people's feelings.
I'm not talking about what I say here on VN so much as what I say around friends and family.