So....only the last season's record matters, right? You're saying that the previous years record should transfer some positive esteem. I understand. Scroll up and re-check the definition of "genetic fallacy" again. Careful, don't be sodomized by the irony along the way.
The problem with your quibble here is that I have clearly not over-looked differences in the current context and only considered the results of last year that are relevant. For UT, many of the players themselves are still there. There is a chance that the new coaching staff can put something together to help them perform better than last year. But, it's an unknown. And all of the glories of yesteryear do nothing to change the fact that it's an unknown (at best) whether or not they will improve over last year.
Being on a weak Oregon team and facing strong conference teams is not better for an individual player. You have perfectly stated why Brown should not choose Oregon. Great job - and I agree!
Again, you're just appealing to the same argument I refuted earlier. The only strength comparison that is relevant to Brown is the current make-up of the conference. Oregon is not a weak Pac-10 team at this time, right now, the time during which Brown would be involved with the program. UT is not a strong SEC team at this time, right now, the time during which Brown would be involved with the program.
Yeah, if it happened before last season, it doesn't exist, right?
No. It exists. It just isn't very relevant to Brown.
Say, Wheaton doesn't still play for the Ducks, but yet you've immortalized him in your screen name....isn't that the same thing you're suggesting as being one of your own previously mentioned fallacies?
lol. You're making this way too easy. Thank you for illustrating my point better than I could have thought to. Yes, Wheaton is immortalized by me, a FAN, not a PLAYER. It's a lot of fun to brag about or immortalize past glories or players of your favorite team. However, Wheaton is going to do nothing for Brown. Just like Travis Henry, Jamal Lewis and Peyton Manning are not going to do anything for him either. Next!
So, nothing the former staff did matters, because they're not here - AND - nothing that was accomplished by the coaches with other players before they got here matters either, right?
Wrong. I have stated multiple times that those things do matter. In fact, I would say that is your best argument. Of course, you didn't include that in your specious manifesto posts.
I'm confused. Are you now so crazed as to think that 54,000 people can come close to matching that of 108,000?!?
Many people who have experienced game-days all over the nation think so. I've seen bigger crowds myself that were much quieter than Autzen.
By "well-known intensity", do you mean the process of your collective fan base making death-threats and incessant chants of racial and sexual slurs toward opposing players - so much so, that you brand of "intensity" was featured in an SI article, showing your "fans" to be some of the worst in all of college sports? Or is this the one where your "intesnsity" causes you to throw urine and dog feces on opposing teams and their fans?
You're like a walking library of logical fallacies. A professor could just have you walk around and talk all day in class and by the end of it, everyone would be expert in how not to present an argument. The SI article did not show our fans to be some of the worst in college sports. It described one case at a basketball game where some individual idiots went over-board in going after Oregon native Kevin Love. I have never seen or heard anything like that at any football game in 20 years of going. If I did, I would have no problem telling them to stfu on the spot.
If they're already planning it before he gets there....would he really be responsible for it....before he even signed? Oh, you're saying that this idea should appeal to him because he's probably stupid enough to believe it. Again, are you lying now, or will you be lying then?
No. I'm alluding to the fact that it's a more compelling story to be part of a program on the rise than of one that is trying to reclaim lost glory.
I have to admit - not too shabby for the 5th best team in the 4th best confernce.
Take away your argument that historical averages reflect current conditions and you really have nothing, do you? I can completely understand why you're getting so frustrated that you have to resort to ad hominem attacks and self aggrandizement.
Quick question: what's the "top team" you mention? I thought you were an Oregon fan? Didn't you read my first post on this, earlier today? Oregon is not a "top team" - even by your notably warped standards.
I'm sorry. Was that confusing? I was referring to the fact that Oregon is currently ranked as a top 25 or 10 team for 2009 and finished at 10 last year. That's what I meant by "top team". In other words, out of the hundred plus college teams, Oregon is ranked near the top. I consider teams that are not ranked in the top 25, like UT, to not be top teams. They might get there again some day. But, currently, not a top team.
I am but one of many, many, many people on this site who you've have dreaded to meet for so long now - and who's patience with your nonsense has finally been exhausted. You're either too dumb to know it - or too stupid to remember it, but you are in over your head, drowing in a shark-infested ocean of your own ignorance, wearing a millstone of your own arrogance.
Appeal to ridicule - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I stated simple and easily verifiable facts, and stand by each of them. I welcome you to refute a single one of them, and if you cannot, then at least be man enough to admit their truth, despite the consequences to your argument. It's called being a reasonable adult. Look into it.
I roundly refuted that argument in specific detail. Your ad hominem attacks and other ramblings did nothing to address my rebuttal.
P.S. - Would you care to make a wager on where Brown ends up? Are you man enough for that?
Gambling doesn't make someone a man. I am not and have never tried to predict where Brown is going. I'm interested to hear. I hope he goes to Oregon. But, I'm not wanting that in order to "win" anything. I just think it would be a good fit for him and the team. So, no, I'm not interested in betting where he will go. If he goes to UT, I will wish him and UT good luck.