‘23 CA QB Jaden Rashada

#430
#430
SGMVols said:
Technically it wasn’t true yet. But now it is. The add/drop deadline at UF has passed so he can no longer enroll there this semester.

UF has no choice but to grant the release IMO. They do not want this kid telling the world that they make NIL promises they can’t keep. It would crush their recruiting
Click to expand...
I think the word is already out on that fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthVol1
#434
#434
onevol74 said:
Is Miami collective letting him out of that deal? If not, I can not see how he can sign with another, regardless of where he goes.
Click to expand...
I doubt they would want to hold him to that agreement. If they held him to it that mean that they'd have to uphold their end of the bargain as well.
 
#443
#443
allvolrecruiting said:
Lol no. Not with a 5 star QB coming in for 2024. Why would losing to us move them towards firing him? We're one of the top teams in the SEC lol
Click to expand...
That is what I’ve been wondering about. Did part of the holdup about paying Rashada come from the fact that they have Lagway commited for next year? Why would you want to commit that much money for back to back 5 star QBs? Especially if they see Lagway as the superior prospect (which in my opinion he is).

Either way, a terrible look for Florida.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jp1
#444
#444
this is a very interesting case to pay attention to. i do not understand how a player can go in front of the NCAA and ask for a release of his NLI on the premise that he was promised 13 million (or it dont matter if it were 50 cents) by a collective and they reneged so he wants out of his commitment to the school, which is supposed to have nothing to do with the collective offereing deals. and surely if he gives them some BS story as to why he wants out, how do they not say "yeah, we read the news and your name has been all over it". people may say this is the wild west of recruiting, but if there is some way to tie the collectives offer to the school as a pay for play, by the letter of the law, you have recruiting violations and one has to wonder, especially with the reputation of the NCAA being shotty at best, if they are not looking for a slam dunk case to use as an example to bust somebody just to try and show everyone they are not toothless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: berryvol, SCRocket, #Vol4Life1991 and 1 other person
#447
#447
allvolrecruiting said:
Lol no. Not with a 5 star QB coming in for 2024. Why would losing to us move them towards firing him? We're one of the top teams in the SEC lol
Click to expand...

They fired Mullen one year removed from winning the East. They made a mistake and the natives are restless and they will not accept mediocrity down there. Losing to TN is what got Shark Boy fired and mark it down, he loses to TN again in the swamp and has a mediocre year he’s gone. I like Billy and wish he could be extremely successful except against UT but I don’t think Florida will be patient enough with him. Their record next year could easily end with 4 wins, 6 at best…

3-4 years is not going to be the floor with big programs anymore. When you have coaches like Heupel, Dykes or even Beamer to an extent showing what can happen in two years it makes it harder for future new coaches.
 
#449
#449
allvolrecruiting said:
Lol no. Not with a 5 star QB coming in for 2024. Why would losing to us move them towards firing him? We're one of the top teams in the SEC lol
Click to expand...

Agree. They may fire him for overall performance, but firing him for losing to Tennessee would be stupid. These teams won’t even be annual opponents anymore after 2024. It’s not like Bama firing a coach who can’t beat Auburn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolNash17 and DiderotsGhost
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top