notverycrucial
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2007
- Messages
- 1,473
- Likes
- 0
Actually, Gore got 90% of the black vote and I think Kerry got less than that(not sure on Kerry). I am betting Obama gets 95% or more, so it is not "about the same" as in the past.
And black people make up only 12% of the electorate so what's their overall impact if they increase their vote by 2 or 3 points? It could make the difference in a swing state ot two (which is enough to win the election if it's close) but most likely their effect as witnessed in polling is negligible.
Wrong again, NVC. Kerry, in addition to his military service had served as Mass. District Attorney, Lt. Governor and twenty years as a US senator! Hardly, the resume of Obama.
Conservatives? Hell, I considered myself a conservative until I realized their was no such thing as conservatism in today's party. Basically, if you're a Republican today, then you have to call yourself a conservative (even if you're not).
I was having a discussion with a liberal girl I recently met. She said she was voting for BO, but commented that once all of the "bigots" come out to vote that Obama wouldn't stand a chance of winning. Basically she was saying that all of the white racists would keep Obama out of the Whitehouse. I said, well if the racists come out to vote, he may have a shot. Basically indicating that the black racists are voting for Obama just because he is black. How many blacks did you see at the DNC, rallys, etc (and it'll be interesting at the polls) when Kerry or Gore ran??? Not near as many as you'll see in this election. Thus proving my point that blacks are just as racist as whites if not more so.
cut it with the BS, if you're going to make that claim, prove it.
unless you're one of those idiots like Cafferty who thinks anybody who doesn't vote for Obama is a racist.
There is no evidence that race will be a factor. Sure, it might be, but there is zero evidence to back up this assertion.
Have you even read the thread? I thought I made it clear that I disagreed with Cafferty's assertion when I wrote:
Again, I was referring to Cafferty, in case that wasn't clear. It's absolutely stupid to think that Obama would be doing better if he was white (as Cafferty spouts). This is a highly polarized electorate, and it was going to be close no matter what. However, some in this forum have argued the opposite of Cafferty: that b/c Obama is black he's actually doing better than if he were white. I argued that that is equally unfounded, too.
I never brought up race -- except to say that there was no evidence to suggest that race would play any role in benefiting either candidate.
read post #36 in this thread. Perhaps I've misunderstood what you were trying to say, but it sounds as if you were claiming that the conservatives here on VN were trying to make race an issue.
I'm trying to get some clarification from you.
Actually, I've been arguing that race is NOT a factor. It seems it's the conservatives on VN arguing the opposite.
Race is a factor IMO. I feel many white Americans feel guilted into voting for Barack because of his skin color.
and sadly, many, many more will not vote for him because of his skin color.
Unfortunately I think race and gender both are playing parts in this campaign. There are going to be those who will not vote for Obama because of his skin color, and there are also going to be women who will vote for McCain/Palin just because Palin is a female.....