Camion Patrick arresed for stabbing incident

#42
#42
bamawriter said:
The evidence does not allow for any other conclusion.
Click to expand...

Actually it does. I believe his oldest son committed the murders and while OJ was at the scene (most likely to cover up the crime committed by his son) he didn't actually kill anyone. That's why OJ's DNA and prints were at the scene.

Go watch the documentary done on the case by the BBC. It's very well done and they came to that conclusion. I thought it was more reasonable than thinking OJ did the crime. OJ simply doesn't have the face of a murderer. He has the look of a soft guy. His son however had a history of violence and mental issues and definitely looked like someone capable of murder.
 
#43
#43
Dobbs 4 Heisman said:
Actually it does. I believe his oldest son committed the murders and while OJ was at the scene (most likely to cover up the crime committed by his son) he didn't actually kill anyone. That's why OJ's DNA and prints were at the scene.

Go watch the documentary done on the case by the BBC. It's very well done and they came to that conclusion. I thought it was more reasonable than thinking OJ did the crime. OJ simply doesn't have the face of a murderer. He has the look of a soft guy. His son however had a history of violence and mental issues and definitely looked like someone capable of murder.
Click to expand...

No.

I'm not going to dignify your idiocy with more than that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#47
#47
Dobbs 4 Heisman said:
Actually it does. I believe his oldest son committed the murders and while OJ was at the scene (most likely to cover up the crime committed by his son) he didn't actually kill anyone. That's why OJ's DNA and prints were at the scene.

Go watch the documentary done on the case by the BBC. It's very well done and they came to that conclusion. I thought it was more reasonable than thinking OJ did the crime. OJ simply doesn't have the face of a murderer. He has the look of a soft guy. His son however had a history of violence and mental issues and definitely looked like someone capable of murder.
Click to expand...

You do realize documentaries are one of the WORST places to look for evidence right? I mean they are inherently biased, they always start off with a goal in mind and ONLY present the evidence that backs it up.

Think about that Making of a Murderer documentary that had people up in arms calling for a police conspiracy. Jurors from the actual case admitted that the documentary didn't present key DNA evidence because it made the guy look guilty (and essentially proved he committed the crime)

So I have no doubt that this documentary you suggested is very convincing, because that is precisely what it is meant to be. Presenting evidence, twisting facts and hiding key ones all to fit their agenda.
 
#48
#48
He seemed like a kid that would get in trouble if he didn't have football in his life. He may not necessarily be a bad kid but he and his brother had nothing and were surely desperate after the game ended for them
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#49
#49
bamawriter said:
The evidence does not allow for any other conclusion.
Click to expand...

Agreed. If OJ didn't do it it, who did? Currently Netflixing the people v. OJ Simpson...the jury was out to acquit from jump. Then Darden insisted on OJ trying on the glove. And then the prosecution mistakenly put Furman on the stand. He was closet racist, but as the evidence proved, there was no way OJ was framed.
 
#50
#50
Nerwen Aldarion said:
You do realize documentaries are one of the WORST places to look for evidence right? I mean they are inherently biased, they always start off with a goal in mind and ONLY present the evidence that backs it up.

Think about that Making of a Murderer documentary that had people up in arms calling for a police conspiracy. Jurors from the actual case admitted that the documentary didn't present key DNA evidence because it made the guy look guilty (and essentially proved he committed the crime)

So I have no doubt that this documentary you suggested is very convincing, because that is precisely what it is meant to be. Presenting evidence, twisting facts and hiding key ones all to fit their agenda.
Click to expand...

Major difference is the guy in the Making of a Murderer documentary actually looked like a murderer. I never bought that Netflix documentary trying to make him look innocent. However, OJ doesn't have that look. Like I said earlier, I think I'm a pretty good judge of character. I can spot a person who looks capable of committing an evil act like murder. OJ simply didn't look like a murderer. Now his son? That guy definitely looked like he was capable of murder. That is why I believed that BBC documentary. It wasn't about the evidence they presented. It was the fact OJ didn't have the look of a murderer but his son did.

The eyes don't lie. As they say, its a gateway to the soul. And people who are murderers or capable of murder typically have a very vacant empty evil look to them. Didn't see that with OJ. Don't see it with Isaiah Wright. But I definitely saw it with that guy from the Making of a Murderer documentary. And I also saw it on OJ's son.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top