If Cali-cheater goes undefeated in conference (which he probably will), do we have to give him the COY award?
I mean, I could coach that bunch and win...
He clearly gets the cheater / recruiter award.
Billy D is underachiving. Stallings in the hunt I suppose...depending on finish. Stansbury...so so.
If you look at it from where they were predicted to finish, to actual finish, doubt that anyone beats Cuonzo in that regard.
If Cali-cheater goes undefeated in conference (which he probably will), do we have to give him the COY award?
I mean, I could coach that bunch and win...
He clearly gets the cheater / recruiter award.
Billy D is underachiving. Stallings in the hunt I suppose...depending on finish. Stansbury...so so.
If you look at it from where they were predicted to finish, to actual finish, doubt that anyone beats Cuonzo in that regard.
If Cali-cheater goes undefeated in conference (which he probably will), do we have to give him the COY award?
I mean, I could coach that bunch and win...
He clearly gets the cheater / recruiter award.
Billy D is underachiving. Stallings in the hunt I suppose...depending on finish. Stansbury...so so.
If you look at it from where they were predicted to finish, to actual finish, doubt that anyone beats Cuonzo in that regard.
Sorry, I missed it.
So if you toss out Stallings...
Then it is either Cuonzo or Cali, right?
Sorry, I missed it.
So if you toss out Stallings...
Then it is either Cuonzo or Cali, right?
When I think of what qualifies as a great coaching job for coach of the year...I think of a coach having to take average-above average players and make them over achieve their own abilities. Even though Cal only has one loss...with the level of players he has he is not exceeding the level of talent he has to put out on the court every night. Cuonzo for sure is. Just my :twocents: