OrangeSquid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2012
- Messages
- 2,441
- Likes
- 2,097
No. It shouldn't. Vaccines are to protect the vaccinated person. It is a personal choice.Then it will get much worse...
Because if the vaccine works, then yes it needs to be mandatory.
You should read the article. What Harvard has developed is a personal, private, instant test that you can perform at home for Covid. The results are not as "fine" as the clinical test but are much more timely. You can actually have an indication that you are infected BEFORE you are contagious with this test. The tests you get from health care facilities are almost always after you are contagious... before you consider they take 2+ days to anaylize.Hmm, weird. At least where I live, people can get tested if they want. I got tested for free.
Honestly, other than letting people use a safe drug even if it isn't effective... I don't have a strong opinion on HCQ. Some doctors say it works. Others claim it don't. I have to believe I would try to find a doctor who administered it if I got sick. The worst it could be is a cheap placebo.Or administer hydroxychloroquine every couple of weeks and lets play the season.
I'm sure manufacture would be distributed to companies making test strips now.Without seeing the data from the saliva test, I agree with the premise that the FDA needs to relax their criteria for a fast non-lab test for the virus. But I wouldn’t rely on a small startup to supply the strips. Get a big company to buy the rights/mass produce/distribute.
Yes we should. They know best. The government Always does what’s right and noble for the good of their people. Name me one thing the private sector does that is better than the government? And don’t start with SpaceX. NASA was a much more cost efficient and better ran from the top down.I agree that a vaccine that was effective would be great, it should be voluntary and nothing more...We should never ever be mandated by the government to put medications or anything else in our bodies.
I'm sure manufacture would be distributed to companies making test strips now.
What’s the FDA standard for such things? It’s a double edged sword. A higher rate of false negatives could outweigh whatever benefit there is in capturing true positives earlierWithout seeing the data from the saliva test, I agree with the premise that the FDA needs to relax their criteria for a fast non-lab test for the virus. But I wouldn’t rely on a small startup to supply the strips. Get a big company to buy the rights/mass produce/distribute.
What’s the FDA standard for such things? It’s a double edged sword. A higher rate of false negatives could outweigh whatever benefit there is in capturing true positives earlier
Many of us have gone around on various Covid related issues but this simple idea has the potential to make peace... and end Covid as a significant health threat.
Please read. If you agree that this makes sense pass it on to friends but ESPECIALLY any elected official at the state or national level you have access to.
Failing the Coronavirus-Testing Test
Re-read the article. This test doesn't exist. He is proposing one be developed to better control the spread. The author and you both agree with Bill Gates on the issue.You should read the article. What Harvard has developed is a personal, private, instant test that you can perform at home for Covid. The results are not as "fine" as the clinical test but are much more timely. You can actually have an indication that you are infected BEFORE you are contagious with this test. The tests you get from health care facilities are almost always after you are contagious... before you consider they take 2+ days to anaylize.
Or administer hydroxychloroquine every couple of weeks and lets play the season.
I got a covid test for free and I had the results the next day, on a Saturday, July 4th. Not badRe-read the article. This test doesn't exist. He is proposing one be developed to better control the spread. The author and you both agree with Bill Gates on the issue.
Bill Gates says most COVID-19 tests in the US are 'completely garbage' because it takes too long to get results
Developing this type of test and procedure was the federal plan until it was rejected at the highest level in April.
I absolutely agree with the idea and rationale of the article.
Then you clearly have firmly established your viewpoint, if you wanna call it that, based on whatever information you've been given.
Tell me what this is if it isn't a pandemic? (I think I know the lyrics to this song, I'd just like to hear them.)