luthervol
rational (x) and reasonable (y)
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2016
- Messages
- 46,839
- Likes
- 19,955
I'm going to assume you see nothing wrong with this reporting.
Your denial is almost comical at this point. There is a huge difference in the BLM protests in 2020 and the protests that's happening in Canada.
BLM activists threaten 'riots' and 'bloodshed' if Eric Adams reinstates NYPD's anti-crime units | Daily Mail Online
Ok so using your made up number, that 7% dwarfs anything done on 1/6 yet there are no commissions, investigations, studies, inquiries, etc.lol......It's a completely relevant fact.
No one disputes the fact that there was rioting. They dispute the fact that BLM is a violent organization.
The fact that over 93% of the protests were 100% peaceful is proof.
Why focus on the 5% on the 1/6’ers who were violent?There is not a huge difference between what is happening in Canada and what happened at over 93% of BLM protests.
Why focus so much more on the 7% than the 93%?
Walked in Georgetown and DC after all of it. Not peaceful. Have friends in LA, not peaceful. Friend of mine in Chicago texted our college group his wife’s text “take the boys to the park before the rioters show up” not peaceful just tolerated or out of sight out of mind if you don’t know.Probably not. I know many who live in Atlanta and attended multiple peaceful protests.
I would be happy to say that the vast majority of people who got COVID did not die from it.
Just as I am happy to say that the vast majority of BLM protests were 100% peaceful.
How dangerous has been an ongoing debate. Some view it as much more dangerous than others. But I think all agree that there is certainly an element of danger. Just as all would agree that anytime there are massive protests, there is an inevitable risk of some nut turning violent.But Covid is not harmless, correct? In fact it is very dangerous considering the lockdowns, masking, social distancing, etc. correct?
lol......It's a completely relevant fact.
No one disputes the fact that there was rioting. They dispute the fact that BLM is a violent organization.
The fact that over 93% of the protests were 100% peaceful is proof.
That's a ridiculous assertion. There was almost zero violence or destruction. The blm violence and destruction was also intended to subvert govt and take over given their targeting of police and federal buildings. Again, zero inquiries into how it got organized or funded. There's a reason for thatThere were plenty of arrests from the BLM riots.
1/6 was an attempt to overturn a free and fair national election....just a tad bit of difference there.
How dangerous has been an ongoing debate. Some view it as much more dangerous than others. But I think all agree that there is certainly an element of danger. Just as all would agree that anytime there are massive protests, there is an inevitable risk of some nut turning violent.
Jan. 6th is the forever gift to the left when accountability is on the table. Looting, fires, destruction and even death are accepted when the left feels wronged all in the name of protest. Looting in Georgetown, thats ok because January 6th. Officer Dorn was shot in St. Louis, that's ok.... Jan 6th.That's a ridiculous assertion. There was almost zero violence or destruction. The blm violence and destruction was also intended to subvert govt and take over given their targeting of police and federal buildings. Again, zero inquiries into how it got organized or funded. There's a reason for that
my statement is and has always been that the vast majority of Germans were peaceful in 1939 to 1945. Of a nation of maybe 80 million a few million actually took up armsMy statement is and has always been, the vast majority of BLM protests and protestors have been 100% peaceful.
And that is an indisputable fact.