Carroll v. Trump ($88 million judgment for Carroll)

Biden is. Trump mispronounces words, makes stupid jokes and sometimes says dumb things. Biden makes absolutely no sense sometimes and frequently says gibberish that doesn’t even resemble words. When it comes to speaking, Biden is by far the bigger gaffe machine.
.... and why not? Let's do one more.


 
  • Like
Reactions: turbovol
Anybody with any mind in Trump's corner should tell him to "Shut the F*** Up." He is his own worse enemy. Everytime he opens his mouth he gets himself in trouble. He will not listen and this is why he is not good for this country Abroad or At Home.
Tells what he wants to tell and then does what he wants to do. He is a Crap Stirrer and always will be causing Chaos and confusion amongst the masses
 
This woman couldn’t even remember what year or when this happened. I understand that you guys hate Trump but come on. This should’ve been thrown out on that alone.
 
Anybody with any mind in Trump's corner should tell him to "Shut the F*** Up." He is his own worse enemy. Everytime he opens his mouth he gets himself in trouble. He will not listen and this is why he is not good for this country Abroad or At Home.
Tells what he wants to tell and then does what he wants to do. He is a Crap Stirrer and always will be causing Chaos and confusion amongst the masses
Good luck with that. You have a better shot at getting BB to become a Trump lover than you do getting Trump to shut up.
 
This woman couldn’t even remember what year or when this happened. I understand that you guys hate Trump but come on. This should’ve been thrown out on that alone.
Hmmm…where I have I seen something like that before…hmmm…
 
  • Like
Reactions: NEO
This woman couldn’t even remember what year or when this happened. I understand that you guys hate Trump but come on. This should’ve been thrown out on that alone.

What did you take away from the case that the jury missed?
 
Trump lawyer rejected claim that juror’s political affiliation signified bias — POLITICO
“A juror's political affiliation is not grounds for dismissal, even in cases involving a political figure," said Trump lawyer Joe Tacopina in a May 2 filing that was unsealed by U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan on Wednesday. Kaplan ultimately sided with Tacopina’s argument, leaving the juror in place.”

Posting this for the next time a jury donkey punches some conservative figure and everybody cries about the jurors being biased.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clarksvol00
Trump lawyer rejected claim that juror’s political affiliation signified bias — POLITICO
“A juror's political affiliation is not grounds for dismissal, even in cases involving a political figure," said Trump lawyer Joe Tacopina in a May 2 filing that was unsealed by U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan on Wednesday. Kaplan ultimately sided with Tacopina’s argument, leaving the juror in place.”

Posting this for the next time a jury donkey punches some conservative figure and everybody cries about the jurors being biased.

"He was a false flag! He was a liberal who tricked Trump's lawyer into fighting to keep him on the jury. Just sayin.' I'm not a Trump supporter."
 
This woman couldn’t even remember what year or when this happened. I understand that you guys hate Trump but come on. This should’ve been thrown out on that alone.


Can someone explain how he was found guilty when she couldn’t remember the year or when? Just asking from a legal aspect. It seems anyone can be found guilty and all it takes it the accusation.
 
Before starting a whole new thread, I recommend you try discussing everything instead of using whataboutism to avoid answering questions.

😂


Have not followed the case at all. What actual facts, other than hearsay, was he convicted on?
 
Can someone explain how he was found guilty when she couldn’t remember the year or when? Just asking from a legal aspect. It seems anyone can be found guilty and all it takes it the accusation.
If she's so unbelievable, maybe Trump would have been better served to show up and deny it happened.
 
I'm no legal scholar, but I think I witness testifying about what she claims happened to her is the exact opposite of hearsay. @RockyTop85?

One person with accusations and no proof is not enough for me to convict anyone on anything. What proof was discovered during trial?
 
I don’t know what the proof was. Didn’t follow it. I know it was not hearsay. Hearsay is not admissible.


Was it more than just her word against his? I know you didn’t follow either and I get it was civil but I just think more than accusations should be enough to find someone guilty.
 
Not what I asked…..
It's a civil trial it's a lower standard of proof from what I understand. If she could reasonably explain why she didn't remember the date and Trump put on absolutely no proof, it seems they can infer she met her burden.
 
Just like Tara Reade, right???
If she winds up testifying in front of a jury, that jury will make a determination as to her credibility and weigh it against the other proof; just like the Trump jury did with this person.

Edit: add another whatabout to the list.
 

VN Store



Back
Top