Carter Page FISA warrant request released.

#155
#155
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#159
#159
Dems are fortunate that Americans don’t care about this Russia BS. This story is not looking good for them
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#160
#160
What we know...The FISA applications DID NOT establish probable cause...oh ya, and another key point, the applications made materially FALSE claims...


The Carter Page FISA Applications

For any who doubted assertions the Steele Dossier was the “primary means” to obtain the Page FISA Warrant doubt no longer.


Questions – Carter Page FISA Applications

The release of these documents is significant. Despite defenses by certain “Blue-checks” on twitter, the majority of Americans see through the nonsense of these applications.

I am somewhat hopeful this release signifies something more underneath the noise. I was genuinely surprised to find this released. Many elements within DOJ & the FBI did not want this to occur.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#162
#162
evillawyer said:
Ok, so sounds like a wiretap warrant on Page was approved by a total of 4 Republican appointed judges and signed off on by Republican appointed intelligence officials for a wiretap starting 1 month after he left the Trump campaign and an incident of the wiretap was that it would allow for metadata collection (but content collection) of those with whom he was in contact with.

And this is a conspiracy to get Trump how?
Click to expand...
What does that have to do with anything? Why would these Judges EXPECT politics to be the underlying motive? How would their republican ties affect how they review and grant warrants?
 
#164
#164
Comey, one of the dirtiest cops on the 7th floor of the FBI in recent history? Foundation of the Mueller probe is based on phony unverified lies, shut it down, this is an embarrassing cloud over the country.

[twitter]1021036060573347847[/twitter]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#167
#167
A Review of the DOJ/FBI FISA Application Release…

A Review of the DOJ/FBI FISA Application Release… | The Last Refuge

...

carter-page-fisa-2.jpg


Why publicly release the FISA application? After all, even with the voluminous redactions, it is very unusual and it would have been exceptionally easy to deny any FOIA request under the auspices of national security. To highlight this question, consider how stunned Fran Townsend was at the release: “Having run The Justice Dept office responsible for #FISA The release of these documents is irresponsible & will irreversibly weaken counterintelligence & Counterterrorism investigations going forward.”

...

You see, it was July 17th (a few days ago) when the Comey, Brennan, Yates, Carter criticisms were on full boil (due to the Trump/Putin presser), when I began to wonder when DNI Coats would reach the point –AGAIN– of saying ‘enough is enough’? My suspicions were that something was soon to happen… because the ridiculousness of it all was nearing the apex. Me thinks this FISA release is in line with that general disposition.

Anyone who thinks this FISA application release is not a big deal has not followed the details, and does not comprehend what is attested to within the FISA application. But that’s in the granular…. for now, let’s stick to the 30,000 ft review.

The overall FISA application is ridiculously short on substance, and generally is a long way from providing the evidence needed for Title-1 surveillance authority over a U.S. person. In fact, the FISA application is very sloppy… almost as if it wasn’t a priority to have a solid and defensible document. I think there’s a simple reason for that.

After all, the DOJ and FBI never thought anyone would ever be looking at this issue; they thought Hillary Clinton was going to win. To quote the disposition of FBI Counterintelligence Agent Peter Strzok: “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office that there’s no way he gets elected – but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.” Key word: “unlikely“, they never contemplated -until later- the full scope of justification that would be needed…. they were setting up something no-one really thought would need to be utilized…. all of the legal apoplexy and ass-covering came in hindsight.

...

Why? Likely because the DOJ-National Security Division (DOJ-NSD) and FBI Counterintelligence needed to find a legal way to spy on the Trump campaign. The 2016 FISA Title 1 surveillance of former FBI employee Carter Page became that legal way. [“The Insurance Policy”]

...
♦ Page #2: The initiating information came from the U.S. State Dept:
fisa-ap-2.jpg


state-department-fisa-crossfire-hurricane.jpg

...
♦ Page #5: The instigator was ODNI James Clapper:
fisa-ap-3.jpg


The funny thing is, James Clapper didn’t even know he was in the FISA application…. and you know what,… I believe him. Why? Because he’s a complete doofus and the people pulling off this FISA fraud/scheme wouldn’t want him to actually be a part of it. Secondly, Clapper published this in January, 2017:

...
♦ Page #8 The FISA application shows ‘surveillance’ started March 2016, referencing a meeting with George Papadopoulos -sourced from Christopher Steele- NOT with the official opening of ‘Crossfire Hurricane’ on 7/31/16.
fisa-ap-4.jpg

...
♦ Page #53 ‘verified in accordance with FBI 4/5/2001 policy.’
fisa-ap-5.jpg

No, actually, the FBI did not review this verified application for accuracy. Quite the contrary: Both James Comey and Andrew McCabe testified under oath to congress the content of the Steele Dossier, Chris Steele, FBI source #1, was never verified for accuracy.
...

•On page #15 they attest the FBI is unaware of any derogatory information about Source #1 Christopher Steele. However, they knew when they filed this application that Chris Steele was shopping the information to the media and talking to Fusion GPS, his employer, and to media outlets.

•The FBI knew the Clinton Campaign was paying for the dossier yet they never informed the court of the political motive behind Christopher Steele.

•The FBI knew they were using media articles (page 21, 22, 24) that were entirely the outcome of their own leaks to the media. On page #23 the FBI correctly states their opinion that Chris Steele was *not* the source of one of the articles; however, they only knew that because the FBI *was* the source of the article. They cited their own leaks as confirmation for the original application.
...
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#171
#171
Former U.S. Attorney Andrew McCarthy Talks Carter Page FISA Warrant Documents

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82yajJR3iHo[/youtube]
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top