With all the evidence against her, the shovel borrowing, etc...please tell something more plausible
I'm not sure there was evidence there to show that she killed the kid at all. There was circumstantial evidence that suggested it, but the defense offered a scenario up that is possible and that the state didn't effectively rebut. There just wasn't enough direct evidence to tie Anthony to actually killing the kid.
I'm not sure there was evidence there to show that she killed the kid at all. There was circumstantial evidence that suggested it, but the defense offered a scenario up that is possible and that the state didn't effectively rebut. There just wasn't enough direct evidence to tie Anthony to actually killing the kid.
Westboro Baptist's next picket should be in Florida.
If the killer is charged with murdering them... just lie about it. Who cares if you get caught in a lie. If your family gets caught helping you lie... who cares? The jury can easily be manipulated. All you have to do is stand in front of them for 5 hours saying "Who cares if they lied? You need proof. I think her dad did it but I'm no accusing him". Her defense lawyer was on par with some of the scummiest I've ever seen.
The problem was the evidence not the jury. It was the right verdict considering the evidence. The ***** probably did it, but after millions of dollars spent on attempting to prove it, they couldn't do it.
Remember Mary Winkler
The jury knew she killed her husband in his sleep, but they bought the idea that she accidentally shot him with a 12 guage blast to the head in the middle of the night
I guess she was such a good wife, she was just cleaning it for him
That's all you need is circumstantial, and the circumstantial was stronger than any case I've seen in a long time. And the defense didn't offer one valid scenario. They said it was an accidental drowning. Ok, so you turn an accidental drowning into a cover up that looks like first degree murder and then you go out for 31 days of partying and getting a tattoo that says beautiful life.
.
Does it matter?
People are convicted all the time without evidence supporting it.
And when there is tons of evidence supporting it, people like O.J. get off anyways.
The system is flawed so there is no point in arguing specifics as if the system is legit. The fact that both her and her mom were caught lying is enough for me to convict her.
The last thing that needs to happen is to involve those dipshats.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
The system is flawed so there is no point in arguing specifics as if the system is legit. The fact that both her and her mom were caught lying is enough for me to convict her.
They didn't prove how she died. They didn't prove how she killed her or that she even did. They proved she dumped the body. Going partying for 31 days shows she's sick, but it doesn't show she killed her. And the drowning scenario was never effectively rebutted. I didn't really think there was near enough evidence to get 1st degree murder. I was surprised to see that she got off on the child abuse charge.